It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
high rated
avatar
Trilarion: Law and justice it is now in Poland after the latest parliamentary election. The funny thing is that the official leader of PiS, Beata Szydło, is not identical with the mastermind behind it, Jarosław Kaczyński, and you think that his is easy enough for the voter to look through, but it seems not so. Or what do you think?

Is law and justice in Poland the end of liberal attitudes? Will Poland follow the way of Hungary? Will division of powers be ended, media be suppressed? Or is it maybe the best that could happen? Will Polands economy grow at minor expenses here and there?

What will happen to the country? How will it change in the next years?

And finally the most important of all: Is Cyberpunk 2077 in danger? Can it still be finished under the circumstances?
We've survived communism, two world wars, and three partitions, I think we'll be fine :P
avatar
JudasIscariot: We've survived communism, two world wars, and three partitions, I think we'll be fine :P
avatar
Elmofongo: Three Partitions?
It's a wikipedia article but it should be a decent starting point if you're interested in learning more:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partitions_of_Poland
avatar
JudasIscariot: We've survived communism
avatar
Crosmando: You talk as if it was a bad thing :)
For us it was. Nothing like having secret police or major food shortages or having to stand in line for 3 or more hours on a Saturday for a loaf of bread.
avatar
JudasIscariot: For us it was. Nothing like having secret police or major food shortages or having to stand in line for 3 or more hours on a Saturday for a loaf of bread.
avatar
Crosmando: Yes but you were all paid the same wages correct? You didn't have millionaires/billionaires pocketing the vast majority of the wealth? I personally would like that kind of equality, even if it meant a lower standard of living than I currently have.
I can't tell if you're trolling me or if this is a serious question...

Oh the wealth was most definitely pocketed, one way or another, and it lead to a huge national debt ran up by the filthy communists...which was solved by selling off most of our industrial sector, including our Gdansk shipyards, after the change from communism to democracy in 1989.


avatar
JudasIscariot: For us it was. Nothing like having secret police or major food shortages or having to stand in line for 3 or more hours on a Saturday for a loaf of bread.
avatar
dewtech: At least you had bread!
We, in the friendly community of friendly socialist republics had to know the shopkeep to even get the bread. Or just do a lot of "haltura" (jobs from the side) to get some bottles of vodka to exchange it for other goods.
The only reason *I* ever got bread is because I was still a kid waiting by himself in line and all I had to was smile at the friendly lady behind the counter :P
Post edited October 27, 2015 by JudasIscariot
avatar
JudasIscariot: We've survived communism, two world wars, and three partitions, I think we'll be fine :P
avatar
KasperHviid: When people pull that argument ... comparing the current state of affairs to the worst nightmare imaginable, and concluding that things ain't that bad ... then thing truly are going down the drain.
Well, I remember when under communism one US dollar was equal to 10,000 Polish Zloty (before the redenomination took place) and the economy was experiencing severe inflation to the point that 1,000 Polish Zloty couldn't even buy a packet of gum 6 months down the road.

Now, we don't have rampant inflation along with an oppressive regime that included secret police that would "disappear" people and people are enjoying a lot of the creature comforts that you'd see in most Western countries. So like I said, we'll be fine, we've survived worse :)
avatar
JudasIscariot: Well, I remember when under communism one US dollar was equal to 10,000 Polish Zloty (before the redenomination took place) and the economy was experiencing severe inflation to the point that 1,000 Polish Zloty couldn't even buy a packet of gum 6 months down the road.

Now, we don't have rampant inflation along with an oppressive regime that included secret police that would "disappear" people and people are enjoying a lot of the creature comforts that you'd see in most Western countries. So like I said, we'll be fine, we've survived worse :)
avatar
KasperHviid: This is way irritating, but I kinda get your point. An optimistic look at things never hurts.
I'm sorry but I don't understand why it's irritating?

Look, I've lived through the tail end of Poland's communism years, visited the country when it had some serious inflation due to the old order crumbling (would you like to buy a chess set for 6 BILLION Polish Zloty? yes, this was a real price before the redenomination), and I live in the country now where a person no longer needs to go through all kinds of hoops just to put food on the table.

So, again, why the irritation when I've seen this country pull through a crap situation (communism then hyperinflation afterwards) with my own eyes?
Post edited October 27, 2015 by JudasIscariot
avatar
JudasIscariot: It's a wikipedia article but it should be a decent starting point if you're interested in learning more:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partitions_of_Poland
avatar
vicklemos: Ahem, ahem :P

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa
Oh I think we just got done with the "Fourth Partition" around that time so we were too busy being scrambled ourselves at the time :)
avatar
JudasIscariot: For us it was. Nothing like having secret police or major food shortages or having to stand in line for 3 or more hours on a Saturday for a loaf of bread.
avatar
Crosmando: Yes but you were all paid the same wages correct? You didn't have millionaires/billionaires pocketing the vast majority of the wealth? I personally would like that kind of equality, even if it meant a lower standard of living than I currently have.
You would rather be poorer, as long as everyone is as poor as you?
avatar
KasperHviid: My irritation isn't because I don't get what you're saying. I do. And I think your angle is great for getting the wider perspective of things. And the 'I'd seen worse' attitude is good. But at the same time, this perspective isn't very healthy for the democratic debate. Our elected leaders will always seem kinda okay 'in perspective', because, at least they're elected, right?

Comparing something to a greater evil disables any kind of criticism. If our government consists of a shoe, a five year old kid, and a cute puppy, it would also be kinda okay, compared to a full-blown suppressive regime.

Human evil are always being justified with comparition to a greater evil. Like in Animal Farm, where critique of the current state of affairs is brushed away by comparing it to the greater evil in the past: "You don't want Jones to come back, do you?"

Again, I totally see your point. And it was an angle I haven't thought of myself ... but the stuff above makes me find it kinda irritating, too.
I never said we should excuse our leaders from the mistakes they make now or that they cannot be at fault.

I am simply trying to show outsiders that this is nothing more than your average post-election situation. Besides, all that Kaczynski & co. will really do is rattle their sabres as they know quite well that our country takes in a lot more Euro funds than it pays out so they'll toe the line.

I lived under a couple of Republican presidential terms (PiS is basically the Polish equivalent of the Republican party when comparing the two) in the U.S. and I certainly didn't feel like there was something bad afoot and I lived as an average citizen, going to work doing whatever average citizens do.
Post edited October 27, 2015 by JudasIscariot
avatar
JudasIscariot: lived as an average citizen, going to work doing whatever average citizens do.
avatar
The-Business: Lemmings confirmed *scnr*
Fun fact: "lemming" is a derisive term used to describe a person who votes for Platforma Obywatelska, if I have my local slang correct :)
avatar
JudasIscariot: We've survived communism, two world wars, and three partitions, I think we'll be fine :P
avatar
monkeydelarge: And now you guys are surviving capitalism.
Capitalism is not a perfect system, not by a long shot, but it still beats communism.
avatar
jamyskis: The problem is that without the corrupting influence of capitalism,
A system is as corrupt as the people working within it make it out to be and, guess what, humans tend to get greedy once their basic Maslowian needs are met.
Post edited October 28, 2015 by JudasIscariot
avatar
jamyskis: an employer who refuses to let an employee pick up their child from school so that the manager can meet their profit targets. Or the bank employee who, under pressure to meet profit targets from their manager, manipulates a customer into buying something they don't need.
An employer who refuses to let an employee pick up their child from school can face severe legal consequences in most countries. I am not sure of the rules on this offhand but I know that that some sort of protection for the employee exists in a capitalist system.

The bank employee scenario can easily be avoided by the customer standing firm and saying "NO!" every once in a while as you are always going to have people attempting to manipulate you into something you don't need. See just about every department store clerk :) It's called "sales", it's done everywhere, and the onus of responsibility lies on the consumer to prevent themselves being manipulated by a savvy clerk or sales employee.

Also, under a capitalist system the aforementioned employee with the child has the choice of changing jobs if they find the employer to be unbearable.
avatar
jamyskis: The problem is that without the corrupting influence of capitalism, communism works just fine.

When people strive collectively to achieve a greater goal than accumulating wealth, the system works beautifully. When the system is abused to protect the powerful elite, it doesn't.

What people forget is that self-evaluation and freedom of expression and opinion are core tenets of communist doctrine

punish greed.
It's without the corrupting influence of people themselves. Your first statement sounds similar to the "Guns kill people!" line of thinking used by anti-gun lobbyists in the U.S. :) The gun (capitalism) doesn't kill (corrupt) people by itself, it needs an actual person to use it that way :)

Define the "greater goal" in your second statement, please. What is the greater goal?

If the system is abused then there are proper laws made to prevent the abuse. Why do you think there anti-monopoly laws in the U.S. and Europe?

Self-evaluation and freedom of expression are also practiced in a capitalist system. In fact, you can take whatever bit of wit you may have, condense it to a single statement, put it on a t-shirt, and sell it for a nice profit in a capitalist society/system :)
avatar
dick1982: You're proving my argument.
avatar
Gremlion: I don't see arguments.
At best you posted equivalent of "Turtles are slower than rabbits"="Socialism development after 1960+ was slower than capitalism".
It doesn't say that system doesn't work.
Enjoy your unpaid internships and 90 hours weeks, which wouldn't let you buy a house in US because they cost $500k upward.
avatar
dick1982: vietcong barely survived the previous financial crash. china basically built ghost cities for the sake of fake GDP growth. they're the worse example of captialism. fool.
avatar
Gremlion: Different cases:
US borrowed money from future generations, built cities on these money, when growth halted they were abandoned. (beating dead horse of Detroit there)

China build ghost cities as preparations for nuclear war.

It's hard to tell when abscess of American debt would pop, but it definitely would try to kill as much debt holders as possible.
Errm Detroit died because the Big Three auto manufacturers couldn't keep up with their Japanese counterparts. The factories, which could only employ unionized auto workers, could not meet the demands of the unions, whatever they happened to be at the time. On top of that, the city itself had nothing else BUT the Big Three automakers being the economic backbone of the city itself. It was the equivalent of a town whose only product was coal or some other non-renewable resource: the resource ran out and so did the money.

It didn't help that the city also had issues with the way it was managed by its mayors and the like. While I am not discounting that there may have been some borrowing, the economic death of Detroit was actually a lot more complicated and nuanced than just over-exuberant borrowing :)
avatar
JudasIscariot: It's without the corrupting influence of people themselves. Your first statement sounds similar to the "Guns kill people!" line of thinking used by anti-gun lobbyists in the U.S. :) The gun (capitalism) doesn't kill (corrupt) people by itself, it needs an actual person to use it that way :)

Define the "greater goal" in your second statement, please. What is the greater goal?

If the system is abused then there are proper laws made to prevent the abuse. Why do you think there anti-monopoly laws in the U.S. and Europe?

Self-evaluation and freedom of expression are also practiced in a capitalist system. In fact, you can take whatever bit of wit you may have, condense it to a single statement, put it on a t-shirt, and sell it for a nice profit in a capitalist society/system :)
avatar
monkeydelarge: Yes, guns don't kill people but that doesn't mean, we should be letting psychopaths and stupid people have access to them. :) Capitalism by itself doesn't corrupt but that doesn't mean capitalism in a world where the majority of human beings are selfish, greedy, power hungry, stupid and have own group preference won't lead to corruption. :)
We don't let psychopaths have access to guns, actually :) AFAIK, there is the Brady bill with its 7 day waiting period and there's also the rule that felons cannot own firearms in the U.S. :) Of course, both the psychopaths and the felons who wish to have a firearm just get those guns illegally regardless of the laws in place :)

As for greed, it is my personal theory that it started out as something necessary for survival. Think about it, back in the days when we were still living in caves, people had no idea whether they were going to have enough food so they learned to accumulate as much food as possible in order to survive the lean years :)
Post edited October 28, 2015 by JudasIscariot
avatar
JudasIscariot: Errm Detroit died because the Big Three auto manufacturers couldn't keep up with their Japanese counterparts. The factories, which could only employ unionized auto workers, could not meet the demands of the unions, whatever they happened to be at the time. On top of that, the city itself had nothing else BUT the Big Three automakers being the economic backbone of the city itself. It was the equivalent of a town whose only product was coal or some other non-renewable resource: the resource ran out and so did the money.

It didn't help that the city also had issues with the way it was managed by its mayors and the like. While I am not discounting that there may have been some borrowing, the economic death of Detroit was actually a lot more complicated and nuanced than just over-exuberant borrowing :)

We don't let psychopaths have access to guns, actually :) AFAIK, there is the Brady bill with its 7 day waiting period and there's also the rule that felons cannot own firearms in the U.S. :) Of course, both the psychopaths and the felons who wish to have a firearm just get those guns illegally regardless of the laws in place :)
avatar
monkeydelarge: A 7 day waiting period will prevent psychopaths and stupid people from having guns? Maybe the really really impatient psychopaths will just use knives or baseball bats instead. I'm sure, most psychopaths will just wait the 7 days. And just because someone is not a felon doesn't mean, he or she is not a psychopath and not stupid. There are psychopaths who haven't been caught yet or psychopaths who are still young so they haven't had the opportunity yet to do what psychopaths do.
I stated this earlier:

Of course, both the psychopaths and the felons who wish to have a firearm just get those guns illegally regardless of the laws in place :)