It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Breja: Once Galaxy becomes mandatory, this thread will be the best answer why. With how many people here use all those clients, there's really little to no reason for GOG not to make Galaxy mandatory.
avatar
Lucumo: Not really. I use Galaxy because I like to know my playtime, convenience comes after that. If it was mandatory though, I certainly wouldn't be buying any games here. Just because you use something, it doesn't mean you don't heavily support the alternative.
You say so, but the fact is people using Galaxy, whatever their reasoning, are hardly sending a "anit-client" message to GOG. And people using the obligatory clients of GOGs competition are sending a very clear message that either they like or outright want to use clients, or at the very least they will put up with using them to get the games they want. That's really the message the gaming community as a whole has been sending the publishers and stores for a long time now. And really (even if its not true in your case) GOG has every reason to expect that should Galaxy become mandatory, people like you who already use the client would not really stop buying games here, at least not for long.

The way GOG responed to the profiles debacle recently makes it pretty obvious that the forum community here, which accounts for the most "old school" part of GOGs user base, is seen by GOG as an annoying, vocal minority. And as we can see even among us here clients are being embraced by a lot of people, including services where they are obligatory.
Steam in virtualbox for rare drm-free titles, that got their way to gabeshop. Thats all.

GaG games are meant to be installed via hands (or gogdownloader, but Im currently on linux laptop). If galaxy was just gogdownloader with plugins - I could install it. But right now its not better than volvo's social network (and even worse, since standalone games nowadays include galaxy.dll too) - with all its telemetry and drm-smelling multiplayer.
Sure, launchers are fine to organize your library, autoupdate games and such. But not when it consume your privacy for exchange
avatar
Lucumo: Not really. I use Galaxy because I like to know my playtime, convenience comes after that. If it was mandatory though, I certainly wouldn't be buying any games here. Just because you use something, it doesn't mean you don't heavily support the alternative.
avatar
Breja: You say so, but the fact is people using Galaxy, whatever their reasoning, are hardly sending a "anit-client" message to GOG. And people using the obligatory clients of GOGs competition are sending a very clear message that either they like or outright want to use clients, or at the very least they will put up with using them to get the games they want. That's really the message the gaming community as a whole has been sending the publishers and stores for a long time now. And really (even if its not true in your case) GOG has every reason to expect that should Galaxy become mandatory, people like you who already use the client would not really stop buying games here, at least not for long.

The way GOG responed to the profiles debacle recently makes it pretty obvious that the forum community here, which accounts for the most "old school" part of GOGs user base, is seen by GOG as an annoying, vocal minority. And as we can see even among us here clients are being embraced by a lot of people, including services where they are obligatory.
That's definitely true but like I said, they also aren't necessarily sending a "pro-client" or "client-only" message. People tend to overlook that, following their assumptions. Of course, this is not the case when it comes to other clients (Steam, Origin etc). I mean, keeping in mind that I don't use Steam and the like because I consider clients to be DRM (in addition to their other DRMs), I would definitely stop buying, forever. Pretty sure I'm not the only one using something optional who would then have objections when it becomes mandatory. Still, people like me and people who don't use anything are probably in the minority. We don't have any data, so we can't really draw any conclusions.

Something tangentially related: Using Galaxy for multiplayer is fine. I really want to know what people who whine about that have to offer as an alternative (apart from direct IP connection and LAN). Last time I asked that someone, that part got ignored.
so i mainly had Steam, Galaxy, origin, then xbox because i have windows 10, then got uplay because of free games, and twitch client also because of free games.

then as a slight joke to see how many clients there are i then installed battle.net, vive since i have a VR, Bethesda, epic, and paradox

i have no games on Bethesda, epic, and paradox most downloaded them just for heck of it :P so i have 11 clients in all

*feels eyes staring at him*
Post edited May 23, 2018 by KnightW0lf
only use gog and no galaxy, so my clients are at 0