It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Themock: It was Jeremy Clarkson from Top Gear and served him right. Here's the story

Aha. That was it! Thanks.
avatar
Wishbone: *snip*

Indeed. Are Blizzard really that naive to think that people aren't going to do things like that? Oh noes! Can't post it their forums, but that's not going to stop them posting elsewhere, or making a nuisance of themselves to the person concerned.
I wonder what the chances of someone in America launching some sort of class action in connection to this?
Best bit is they might be about to run into legislation that stops them doing this. The Data protection act for one requires that personal information be kept secret unless the other person agrees at the time it was submited. Not upon request 4 years later they can't suddenly change the rules to require it they will need to redo all accounts in the UK at least.
avatar
Wishbone: That is actually excellent. If Blizzard can be made aware of this, that's the sort of thing that carries weight. If only a prominent gaming site could interview some officer about it.

all interviews *now* have to be cleared through the pentagon due to Rolling Stones thing people might have heard about :p
But... I know a lot of people who play WoW over here dunno how many of them post.
avatar
akwater: all interviews *now* have to be cleared through the pentagon due to Rolling Stones thing people might have heard about :p

Perhaps I live under a rock, but I have no idea what happened there. Got any links?
Also, rumor has it this requirement is similar to one required by Korean law where sites of over X number of users must require real names be used. Of course, that realistically can only be applied to those in Korea, if such rumor is true.
avatar
bansama: Perhaps I live under a rock, but I have no idea what happened there. Got any links?

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/119236?RS_show_page=0
:) it is why Petraeus has been appointed to take the lead in Afghanistan,
avatar
wodmarach: Best bit is they might be about to run into legislation that stops them doing this. The Data protection act for one requires that personal information be kept secret unless the other person agrees at the time it was submited. Not upon request 4 years later they can't suddenly change the rules to require it they will need to redo all accounts in the UK at least.

Posts from before this is implemented won't have the real name attached, so I don't think it will run afoul of that law. They'll probably have another ToS that you have to click through on the new forums.
More info!
A possible theory is that a Korean Law may be responsible for Blizzard's decisions.
http://kotaku.com/5582040/is-korean-law-behind-blizzards-real-name-policy
Or it could just be the agreement Blizzard signed with Facebook.
Post edited July 08, 2010 by PoSSeSSeDCoW
avatar
drmlessgames: Fixed.
More fixed.

You know, if you eat a blizzard too fast, it may freeze you.
avatar
Stuff: What I find amazing is what we (gamers) will accept (DRM) and agree to (revealing full names) . . . just to play a game.

ANYTHING, 'CAUSE IT'S TEH WOW, MAN!!!
Post edited July 08, 2010 by drmlessgames
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NgAkWxcPBE&feature=player_embedded
Online fake identity generators FTW.
Wow, some disgruntled players (or just anon legion) has set up a blog (I don't think I can link that...) specifically to dig a few Blizzard's employees' personal (and their families') information. O_o
avatar
Catshade: Wow, some disgruntled players (or just anon legion) has set up a blog (I don't think I can link that...) specifically to dig a few Blizzard's employees' personal (and their families') information. O_o

Good for them. While I hope that nobody does anything with the info, if the company is okay with making their customers vulnerable, then they should have to deal with it too. At the very least, their complaints might increase the chances of this idiocy being put down.
avatar
Catshade: Wow, some disgruntled players (or just anon legion) has set up a blog (I don't think I can link that...) specifically to dig a few Blizzard's employees' personal (and their families') information. O_o
avatar
EndlessKnight: Good for them. While I hope that nobody does anything with the info, if the company is okay with making their customers vulnerable, then they should have to deal with it too. At the very least, their complaints might increase the chances of this idiocy being put down.

So just because upper management thought something was a good idea, every janitor at the company should suffer?

That's hilarious.
avatar
Catshade: Wow, some disgruntled players (or just anon legion) has set up a blog (I don't think I can link that...) specifically to dig a few Blizzard's employees' personal (and their families') information. O_o

Do you have the link to that? :)
avatar
Gundato: So just because upper management thought something was a good idea, every janitor at the company should suffer?

Who is more important, the customers or the janitor? Neither. They should both be treated with respect; respect for personal privacy that the company and fools posting personal info are denying them.