SimonG: But they don't "cut the game apart" 99% of the games already are complete without any DLC. ...But the concept is solid, as it is a great way to make profits for a company.
99% is probably quite exagerrated because then there would be only 1% left for all the DLC included versions. This seems to be a too low number and underestimating the significance of DLC.
The concept is not so different from expansions. Except for the content size and number and maybe way of delivery it's the same thing or have I missed something. So why should it be better or worse?
StingingVelvet: The problem is your cynicism makes you think they do this even when 90% of the time they do not. ...but it's mostly handled okay and "day zero" does not mean it was "cut from the game." It's an ignorant point of view.
What has become wrong lately with saying that one favors large DLCs and GOTY editions? I think this is perfectly okay, but maybe it is not.
And I think you misunderstood me. I have nothing against those DLCs which are okay and I never said so. I just don't find it exciting to buy numerous pieces, I only want one. There should be nothing wrong with it and if reality is like this - the better. :)
And there is no difference in saying that the whole is cut into little pieces or that the little pieces are combined to make the whole. The difference is philosophical and both views are equally valid and can be applied at any given time, because it's not the point. The only point is what is more fun and buying DLCs is not much fun for me unless they come in bundles and if they do so, fine.