Poirot, definitely, and unlike that pansy Holmes he actually had the guts to kill somebody when need be.

Then again, if we're talking boxing, then there's no way that I could bet against Holmes.

As for intellect, it's generally agreed upon that Poirot is the brighter detective.

There was a game, as well as this: Shadows over Baker Street. Not canon, of course, but plenty of fun. My personal fanon has Holmes and the mythos meet though.

My word. That would have been incredible indeed.

I am a BELGIE!!!!!

:)

You bought buns and you didn't tell me?!

Columbo operates on a different level. He knows who committed the crime before it's even been committed.

Holmes is the ultimate detective. He has the complete mix of skills he needs to resolve problems by himself, honed to perfection. He's like Batman without the dependance on gadgets.

Detective Dee could take all of them in a fight, though.

You should not speak with an accent when you know I am so hungry!

I love both, but I'll take Poirot.

It definitely isn't canon (the story is set in a parallel universe) but check out A Study In Emerald by Neil Gaiman. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.

On-topic: Holmes, especially if he's anything like Benedict Cumberbatch's portrayal in Sherlock.

I read only a little of Holmes and just about everything I could get my hands on of Poirot. He's by far my favorite. Yet I can't stand Miss Marple...

My vote goes to combining the minds of Holmes and Poirot. Oh wait, they all ready did and got Monk from that, so never mind.

That reminds me, have you read Neil Gaimans A study in emerald?

*tries to imagine Monk on heroin or even trying to grow a moustache*

its just not working ;)

At least he wouldn't dispose of the needles improperly!!! :0

I wish GOG had Infocom's Sherlock. You could enter 221B study, plug your ears with cotton balls, play the violin, take the pistol, shoot drug vials in Holmes's hands, get a matchbook a bit later and smoke his pipe with the tobacco from the Persian slipper then shoot Holmes.