Posted July 24, 2011
Instead of a lengthy and angry reply, I'll say this: you're wrong.
mpartel: One category of such ideas is essentially Vestin's "INSANE" idea of an international entertainment tax, possibly adjusted to be more democratic instead of comittee-based. It doesn't seem entirely insane to me. Dude, that was the philosophical equivalent of mad science ;P !
On a more serious note, as most unified systems that control too much - it's probably too utopist.
Curiously enough - it sounds like a step in an anti-cyberpunk direction; Instead of a future where people are governed by corporations (a vision that isn't as far-fetched as it sounds), it would be a worldwide federation, with this "entertainment tax" covering one facet...
But if you take take a few steps further, you might as well tax EVERYTHING this way, escalating taxes to 100% of people's income, thus making money obsolete... and we do end up in a centrally planned communist utopia. People get everything they want but fulfill their part of the social contract by giving stuff in return...
Yup. All it needed was a tiny step further.
Of course - it could be a democratic utopia, where people would vote what content should be produced... but some of the same people would have to be the ones to produce it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52e06/52e0687db73c8b65ce35c99f92f7acf23c5221c8" alt="avatar"
On a more serious note, as most unified systems that control too much - it's probably too utopist.
Curiously enough - it sounds like a step in an anti-cyberpunk direction; Instead of a future where people are governed by corporations (a vision that isn't as far-fetched as it sounds), it would be a worldwide federation, with this "entertainment tax" covering one facet...
But if you take take a few steps further, you might as well tax EVERYTHING this way, escalating taxes to 100% of people's income, thus making money obsolete... and we do end up in a centrally planned communist utopia. People get everything they want but fulfill their part of the social contract by giving stuff in return...
Yup. All it needed was a tiny step further.
Of course - it could be a democratic utopia, where people would vote what content should be produced... but some of the same people would have to be the ones to produce it.