codywg: Hey @lace_gardenia,
I think you're being a little presumptuous about the OPs beliefs, I re-read Wolf109's posts and I can't find any references to LGBTQ or Transgender ideas of any kind; I was under the impression that they (Wolf109) were referring to the state of surveillance and the data mining of human experiences (ala
The Age of Surveillance Capitalism) as a comparison to the cyberpunk universe.
Anyway, if I could be so bold as to suggest that perhaps, instead of assuming you know what people are thinking and/or referring to; if the idea or context of what they are conveying or trying to convey is vague. Perhaps it would be more prudent to simply ask for an explanation of their point of view to clarify any ambiguity.
May we all learn to communicate more concisely; I hope we can change the face of discourse by engaging on level grounded rhetorical debates.
Kindest Regards from an anonymous keyboard warrior!
lace_gardenia: that's because the mods removed a bunch of posts by that user. there were plenty of general anti-lgbt stuff there.
there was also a posted thread about how it was "very sad" that R Talsorian games and Mike Pondsmith supports Black Lives Matter.
so there is no benefit of the doubt left to
give, unfortunately.
I understand and appreciate your position; however, your response was superfluous and rather inflammatory.
May I suggest that everyone refrain from using the position others have held outside of the current context. I don't believe that it is possible to know the past offender in fact still holds the opinions they once had.
I would posit that it is in the best interests of everyone to approach every discussion with the idea that perhaps those who you think hold a certain position, based on past interactions, have adjusted said position through self reflection and better judgement.
I am of the opinion that we could all use a little bit less judgement and perhaps a little bit more space for objective discourse; I would also argue that many people will change and/or have changed their worldview over time and that the whole purpose of debate is to help people understand and appreciate the view you currently have, and help steer their view more towards yours. If, however, you don't allow that space for course correction than what is the purpose of having discussions other than simply trying to be hurtful to other people to no end?
Thanks for your consideration!
Regards, fellow idealist and everyday human!
Much love!
EDIT: PS:
I would also like to point out that they (Wolf109) was not in fact arguing anything anyway; they were simply relating an opinion and an anecdote which does not in my experience constitue argumentative intent.
Also to be clear my intent isn't to judge you; rather I simply want to help everyone come together under the umbrella of amicability or, at the very least non-antagonism..