orcishgamer: Fun article, not new news to me, but maybe it'll get more readership given the Diablo 3 fiasco and raise awareness somewhat. Blizzard has taken a few lumps over its online strategy lately, it's good to see. Ideally I'd like to think they'll right their ship, but I'm a bit of a realist, they probably won't.
The answer as to whether they'll right their ship is in the hands of us, not Blizzard.
If enough of us support that intrusive DRM, then that's the direction they'll go. If enough of us avoid it like the plague, then that's the direction they'll go.
And don't worry. It doesn't have to all happen at once. If you can convince one person per month to no longer buy crap with such restrictive DRM, and many of us simply do that, in time, it will be gone.
I think this article was mostly right on point, most especially the part about making the whole experience for us legitimate buyers worse than the experience the piraters endure. I cannot STAND some of the shit that these things put on my computer, and getting rid of it is sometimes a chore in itself.
Between that fact, and the fact that no matter how well they get at making DRM someone will get equally well at cracking it, I believe it's only a matter of time before DRM will be gone, with the possible exception of always connected. But we as gamers can speed that whole process up by simply not purchasing games like Diablo 3. Nothing gets the attention of a company like hits to their bottom line does.
So many folks, (and I would consider them foolish and inconsiderate-mmm, sounds pretty American to me) are OK with the always connected idea, that it's going to probably be the hardest one to beat. And I say foolish and inconsiderate because 1)Foolish because they think it's never going to be a burden for them. lol. At some point, somewhere, somehow, something is going to happen that prevents them, as legitimate purchasers, from playing their game when they want to play it. And they'll probably whine like hell when it does. And 2) inconsiderate because the fact is, and it is a FACT, internet service itself is nowhere near 100%. And it never will be. And to support a policy that intentionally discriminates against so many others without a care in the world since it doesn't affect them is, IMO, very inconsiderate.
I'll stop here in this thread and let all who wish to flame away now. You have my word I won't respond.