hucklebarry: sort of. I think what he is saying is similar to the DRM issues. Companies claim DRM saves them money, Data trends seem to show other wise.
Companies are claiming used sales are killing them, but the data he quoted means people are choosing to buy digital and DLC even when they have the option to buy trade-able games currently. So peoples choices are debunking the claims of the industry.
For me, I could care less about his slant... I just liked the numbers from NPD which aren't accessible to consumers.
Eh, I've only glanced the rest of the post but the numbers he seemed to be comparing simply don't compare well.
For instance, he's putting meaning behind used sales trending down according to NDP, versus DLC sales being up .... No kidding. Used sales are curbed more and more due to Uplay/Origin/Steam etc, Indie purchases which are only digital, and more. They're down because measures are being used against them. (Something which would be completely destroyed if digital resale was forced)
He also belittles the numbers involved in Used game sales, even though we're talking well over a billion dollars pure profit on used games per year for Gamestop alone. The Profit margin for used games for gamestop is
almost 50% Anyway, DLC is becoming more and more common, and there's measures being taken against used sales on a lot of sides. That one shows an increase and one shows going down, does not suddenly mean any arguments about their effect become meaningless. That's all I wanted to say :)
And yeah, I used to like NDP charts a lot too. Although, unless they've changed over the years, they didn't include digital sales, or at the very least lacked significant data. For instance, Steam numbers were never in there, they used to be based on retail. At least back when I looked at them.