Posted March 24, 2010
Ah. The guy preaching maturity starts a sentence with "Dude". Classic.
TheMadSpin: You posted a thread called "EA starts charging for demos," simply because someone reported that an analyst who doesn't even work for EA said so.
The original source seems to have been an interview with an EA employee who was privy to that sort of information. At any case, it's an interesting topic given the sheer amount of bullshit experimentation we're seeing amongst publishers right now.
TheMadSpin: Aside from that, if there wasn't a notion of what a traditional demo is, then no one complaining about this would have a semiotic notion of what they're complaining about. Calling something a "traditional demo" especially as a means of clarifying irresponsible remarks by an analyst (and later by misinformed fans and forum posters) seems to be a ratification of the fan idea of what a demo traditionally is. To argue otherwise is nonsense and a very very vague and failing attempt to justify the irresponsible post to begin with.
A demo is traditionally free. EA wants to charge you, and still call it a demo. Where's the nonsense again?
TheMadSpin: The only thing obvious is that you cherry picked the one source that fit your preexisting notion of how EA works and are doing your very best to justify it even as new information comes out and nullifies it.
I didn't do a full source review, no. I don't have time for that when I'm viewing my gaming news sites. It only sounds a bit too much like something EA would do. New information? Where?
TheMadSpin: Then again, you're the same guy who created the anti Mass Effect 2 post when you hadn't even played it, so it's not as if your bias and irresponsible "journalism" hasn't been seen here before.
Oh great, dragging in an age-old thread for completely random and nonsensical reasons, involving an article not written by myself, and then trying to blame it all on me. That's real good, real separation of person and cause there. I can't remember exactly what is was about, but as I recall I found an interesting article that showed off some of the major weak points of Mass Effect 2 - a game that had been receiving 96%+ scores from most major reviewers. You'd think it was fucking perfection with that score. Well, it isn't. It's pretty far off in fact. That was what I was trying to get at.
TheMadSpin: I'm too lazy to go back and see if your brand of sensationalism and pig pigheadedness is reserved for EA or if you just hope to rack up your rep and post count by creating threads devoted to smearing or complaining.
Garbage. Rep? What? Post count? There's no post counter on the forums. Pigheadedness? Sure. For the record, there are people who start WAY more threads here than I do. I just do it when I come across something that I think is interesting. Gaming related that is, if you want to I can start linking scientific publications I find interesting here too.
TheMadSpin: I know that the only two threads I've ever seen you start are basically just hyperbolic and exaggerated reposts of someone else's ideas that are then backed up with either no personal data, or followed up by ignoring any evidence that undermines your original thesis. That is, in no way, a sound idea.
And you've been here for what? Two weeks? Are you one of Anjohl's alts?