Posted January 26, 2012
Pheace: Why do you keep saying it's only just released when we already explained in this thread EADM has been around for far longer than 'Origin' has and it's the same thing.
You also have no proof that it's introduction is a causal result of the contract dispute. If anything it's just beneficial to them.
There's also no proof it's a rush job.
EADM and Origin share code yes they are not the same, thats like saying steam is WOW. You also have no proof that it's introduction is a causal result of the contract dispute. If anything it's just beneficial to them.
There's also no proof it's a rush job.
We know a lot of the details, about what happend
1. Around the time of DA2 Valve changes it's Steam publisher contract that restricts ingame stores and requires all things available in any store must be available via steam it also requires price matching with other stores etc.
2. Valve and EA have a very public dispute over this and EA announces it will no longer release it's first party games on steam if they have DLC planned after DA2, DA2 is very publicly removed from steam the day DA2 DLC hits. Valve cite breaking of the publisher agreement due to an ingame store. Shortly before this Crysis 2 was removed for the similar reasons.
3. Origin was released less than a week before C2 was removed and just over 5 weeks before DA2... Valve claim it was due to EA request as they are now Origin exclusive EA continues to sell it through other platforms and posts statement calling them out...
Now consider the contract changes occurred 2-3months before Origin opens. EA has no rival to Steam and therefore no... leverage shall we say... in contract negotiations. Valve pretty much demanded a cut of all profits related to games DLC even if their servers weren't providing the content and Valves cut is thought to be 20-50% of any item sold through it's store (yes really). EA had a lot of reasons to rush out Origin before it was originally planned to release.