Reever: People are really so naive...of course every government does this and of course they can't read all the data they store. I have read 1984 and I'd hate such a society, but we're not there yet and this is blown out of proportions, if you ask me. And it's not like they care about mails you write to your lover or for the porn you watch. They're looking out for terrorists (ideally, of course).
PetrusOctavianus: Today they are looking for terrorists. Tomorrow day they may be looking for political dissidents, or people with "deviant" meanings or sexual preferances.
The really naive thing in all this is not being surprised that such extreme surveillance exists, but thinking that the US and other western governments will always remain benign and not abuse the surveillance data. In all the world's history,
democracy and personal freedom is the exception, not the norm. That's why I wrote "ideally, of course". I myself am not naive, so I know fully where it can lead because of course, humans are corruptible. But then you just have to take them down :D
In all honesty, if people really want such programs to disappear (which they won't, anyway) then they have to accept more threats to their security. And the masses will ALWAYS complain, be it they hear about PRISM or that without it we have some successful terrorist strikes.
I love the good old quote: "Those who sacrifice their freedom for security deserve neither", but I still think we have to strike a balance and at the moment, I'd stay it's not too bad. This of course depends on what else comes to light in the following months...
Siannah: The irony was how the US accused China of hacking activities - and now looks like the possible bigger culprit.
Best part of the recent developments: claims that the european intelligence agencies were well aware of what Prism was, does and how far it reached.
Surprise, surprise - the government... lies. No, no and no. What do people think governments do? What do people think their secret agencies do?
If you think about it, there's no need for an outcry or to say anything is ironic.
A government is there to ensure it's people's survival. For that their secret agencies need to collect information. The Chinese are just too dumb to do it too openly, it seems (and they surely have some other, hidden programs, don't worry).
The European Intelligence Agencies were all well aware of this and that's why more or less all the politicians didn't point the finger at the US (that came with their people's outcry). I don't know if they were aware of the scope and I do wonder how submissive they might be if they knew about
supposed bugs in European embassies, but they surely knew about the programs, cuz hey, France and UK do the same thing!