It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Licurg: You shouldn't have bought Ultima 9 ...
avatar
lugum: No he meant Sacrifice.
Fixed

What the actual fuck is with the necro topics this evening
Post edited March 07, 2014 by reaver894
I search for posts before starting something new...in the olden days that was known as good netiquette instead of various places' board-police giving it the bad rep of "thread necromancy". :-)
Sooooo, it was you that bought Jack Keane during the insomnia sales? ;)
avatar
Licurg: You shouldn't have bought Ultima 9 ...
avatar
lugum: No he meant Carmageddon.
careful now, youre speaking heresy.
avatar
CrashNBrn: I search for posts before starting something new...in the olden days that was known as good netiquette instead of various places' board-police giving it the bad rep of "thread necromancy". :-)
+1 for thread necromancy. I think it's better to resurrect old threads like this and keep all the information in one place, rather than starting a new thread every time.
avatar
CrashNBrn: I search for posts before starting something new...in the olden days that was known as good netiquette instead of various places' board-police giving it the bad rep of "thread necromancy". :-)
It all depends on the age of the thread, and the value of the contribution of the necromantic post. In this case, I think the thread necromancy was fully justified.

Quite often however, people resurrect threads that have been dead for more than 4 years, for no other reason than to say "I also find this issue annoying", or even worse, to reply with a "I disagree" to a 4 year old post made by someone who has since left the forum.
Do you mean that GOG added Licurg's last game suggestion? XD
Post edited March 08, 2014 by phaolo