Posted March 23, 2014
One thing I've noticed (though not so much for games, but it seems to have merit where music is concerned) is the total number of reviews. Some items people seem to only take the time to review if they really liked it enough to want to tell people about it. If you toss 5$ at something and it's meh, then why even give it the time it takes to tell others it's just OK, or marginal?
Something with 300 reviews is more likely to be good that something with 55, assuming the visibility of the items are equal, like albums from the same artist. If a band has 5 albums, the one with the most reviews is probably the best of the bunch. They will probably all have 4 1/2 stars, but there is probably an album where only the super fans are writing reviews and it has like a quarter the reviews the their major album.
It's a lot easier to gauge with music where there are direct comparisons, but if nobody is reviewing something either people just don't know what they are missing, or it could just not be worth talking about.
Something with 300 reviews is more likely to be good that something with 55, assuming the visibility of the items are equal, like albums from the same artist. If a band has 5 albums, the one with the most reviews is probably the best of the bunch. They will probably all have 4 1/2 stars, but there is probably an album where only the super fans are writing reviews and it has like a quarter the reviews the their major album.
It's a lot easier to gauge with music where there are direct comparisons, but if nobody is reviewing something either people just don't know what they are missing, or it could just not be worth talking about.