It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
keeveek: So all WadjetEye adventure games should get immediate 1/10. It doesn't matter they are made to imitate the 80s adventure games, we should rate them by today's standards, so 1/10!
You missed the point. WadjetEye games are good even by today's standards. They replicated the good things about old-school design and took away the stuff that doesn't work anymore.
avatar
Crosmando: Also: The only decent game reviews are on RPGCodex
HAHAHAHAHAHA, nice joke.
Post edited July 21, 2013 by Neobr10
Kotaku trashed it in much the same way. Reviewers are utterly incapable of considering it a time piece, it has to be a new modern game or they hate it. The Kotaku reviewer even says in the comments the game should appeal to a broader demographic than people who liked the original, when the whole point of Kickstarter is those people funding a game made for them.

This is going to happen a lot with Kickstarters and reviews.
You can't really blame the reviewers for reviewing it as a regularly released game without taking into account sentiments and nostalgia and such. The game might have largely been made for and due to those reasons (Kickstarter funding and such), but it is being released as a new game in stores.
And reviews on the major sites are mostly intended for people that are in the market for new games and as such it makes sense that a remake of a game where the original was already slightly flawed doesn't really cut it for most kids.
And the Kickstarter people probably don't care about all that since they knew what they were investing in and they judge the game on different things.
That's how I see it anyhoo.
avatar
xxxIndyxxx: Yeah gamespot basicly bashed it for being a point and click adventure......

Somehow larry get's all this crap for just being a paintjob but somehow monkeyisland got a free pass...twice... and don't give me that crap that monkeyisland is 10 times better because it isn't, they have a different setting and a different kind of humor but take that out of it and you get basicly equal games. Humour is a matter of taste.
avatar
yyahoo: I will say this about the difference between the MI games and the first Larry. The MI games are significantly longer than Larry 1, especially if you don't experiment a lot to see all the little jokes from clicking story-independent items in the game.

This is the complete walkthrough (again, independent of exploring items to click on). Spoilers, obviously.
http://www.sierrahelp.com/Walkthroughs/LSL1VGAWalkthrough.html

Needless to say, there's not much to it.

But again, given that it's a remake of a 1987 game, and the whole point of the project was to simply give it a new paint job. I still don't think it's fair to criticize the project. Now, if they build a completely new Larry game and it turns out like this, all bets are off.
It's worth noting that if you're going to talk about length (no, game length, shut up Larry!), LSL1 isn't a remake of a 1987 game, it's yet another remake of a 1981 game, the text-based Softporn Adventure (included in the GOG release of Larry's Greatest Hits and Misses). In that regard we should be comparing it to its Infocom contemporaries (Zork 1, 2 and maybe Deadline), in which case yeah it's still a pathetically small game.
Post edited July 22, 2013 by Blackdrazon
Did you read the Eurogamer review?

They purposefully assigned a female reviewer - leaning towards the feminist code no doubt - to review the most misogynistic, navel humor extruding game in existence.

Yeah. So much for at least attempting to avoid journalistic bias.
PC Magazine has a slightly better review, but still raises the point that LSL: Reloaded doesn't bring enough new to the table.

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2422463,00.asp
avatar
keeveek: So all WadjetEye adventure games should get immediate 1/10. It doesn't matter they are made to imitate the 80s adventure games, we should rate them by today's standards, so 1/10!
avatar
Neobr10: You missed the point. WadjetEye games are good even by today's standards. They replicated the good things about old-school design and took away the stuff that doesn't work anymore.
Personally I don't consider wadjet eye games to have replicated everything good. They are FAR too low res for my liking, particularly for their highly detailed art style. Everything ends up looking like a mess.