It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
I remember watching a video someone posted of whati think was an australian show, where in a town-hall-like setting. Several Australian politicans or at least people who had an important say on censorship laws. They weren't defensive at all and actually really relaxed on the position of maintaining that no-ratings stance. Anyone else see that? Their replies were great, both as comedic gold and entertaining value. They said stuff like, if some people in Australia really want these games, they would find ways to obtain them, implying that they would have to illegally obtain them. They justified not giving games a rating, but allowing gambling-related activity with stupid arguments, and saying there was no contradiction there at all.
Post edited February 27, 2011 by drmlessgames
Warner Bros are appealing

And its not often one can say that...
avatar
Aliasalpha: Warner Bros are appealing

And its not often one can say that...
They got bribe money this time :D
avatar
Roman5: Australia: No fun allowed
Of course not. It's a prison colony.

[EDIT]
Perhaps I should put my off-colour remark into context, before it gets taken OUT of context. By calling present-day Australia a prison colony, I'm alluding to the fact that old politicians often cling to outdated "family values" which, while some are still worth holding on to, do nothing but constrain our growth as creatively intelligent beings. History, like evolution, is meant to teach us to throw away the bad things (while still remembering what "bad things" are, so that we don't pick them up again), and keep the good. Of course, "good" and "bad" are relative terms, and the the definitions of both become more disparate the wider the generational gap becomes.
Post edited March 01, 2011 by predcon