Posted November 17, 2011
Forgive me if it was beaten to death, forum search did not yield any interesting results and I do not lurk here regularly.
I think Amazon shows reviews like that - the most helpful good review AND the most helpful bad review, side by side. It would be great if such a solution was implemented here as well. As it stands, reviews get often swamped by 5/5 bad cases of nostalgia glasses. Of course, it is inevitable on a site dedicated to old games - but all the better reason it should be averted.
Of course, GOG management might prefer to have good reviews on all (well, most) their games, as it might make people buy even the mediocre ones. Then again, after people get burned, they will distrust even - or especially - the good reviews, so it is a double-edged sword. I also understand that the question of review reliability is long, broad and old one. Still, I do find the Amazon system superior. I wonder, am I alone in those sentiments?
I think Amazon shows reviews like that - the most helpful good review AND the most helpful bad review, side by side. It would be great if such a solution was implemented here as well. As it stands, reviews get often swamped by 5/5 bad cases of nostalgia glasses. Of course, it is inevitable on a site dedicated to old games - but all the better reason it should be averted.
Of course, GOG management might prefer to have good reviews on all (well, most) their games, as it might make people buy even the mediocre ones. Then again, after people get burned, they will distrust even - or especially - the good reviews, so it is a double-edged sword. I also understand that the question of review reliability is long, broad and old one. Still, I do find the Amazon system superior. I wonder, am I alone in those sentiments?