I've played plenty shmups across various platforms and still do, but I don't have a problem playing "lesser than really impressive" games and frankly it mostly depends on a personal taste in many ways. Shmups aren't all alike, and while I like some of them I don't happen to enjoy certain sub-genres. Does it makes them bad? Nope, they have their own fans, people who found those enjoyable, good for them I suppose. So I simply take each shmup for what it is, and if I like it, as it is with Raptor, then I'll find it enjoyable not bothering much about comparing one to another when playing one, contrary to what you have said there. And so yesterday I played Raptor again and unsurprisingly I found it just as enjoyable as it was before when I played it the first time. There are many little things I like about this game. For shmups in general it's a matter of simply enjoying the "game flow", and if I do then I'm happy, simple as. :-)
Raptor is simply a classic euroshmup for me, a good and well-polished game which I enjoy. I simply like it for what it is, and all that arguing about which game is better... meh. With old games of my childhood, like this one, if I play them today and I experience the same enjoyment I had back then - it brings smile upon me and it's good enough. I like or dislike shmups for what each one is, for how each one plays on it's own, separately. I'm just glad there are various games in that old school genre.
Another positive thing with Raptor is that it's accessible shmup game. Many other shmups are often hardcore and will punish player mercilessly for every little mistake. So in a contrast it makes Raptor enjoyable for those who aren't familiar much with the genre, who may be just getting into it, and for that it's a good start, giving a taste of what the genre is, providing some challenge but not being hardcore. As such I consider it important to the shmups genre.
Post edited August 12, 2010 by Treewyrm