cyberchief: I see. But, he doesn't think it's stealing.
Maybe not. But what do you think?
Regardless of the legalities, or the debates over what is and isn't piracy or stealing, the question, as I see it, follows this path:
a) Do you want to see more companies adopt customer-friendly policies by selling classic, arguably good quality old games, and/or developing high quality good, mature, new games?
b) If so, do you think these companies should be supported in the marketplace as much as possible to do more of that?
If you answered yes to both of these questions, then it's pretty clear what you should do. Or, how about a less wordy, more blunt line of questioning:
What do you support? a) A company like GOG/CDPR that brings you good games, DRM-free, with unlimited downloads, no region restrictions, no regional pricing, generous sales, fair pricing, and countless additional bonus materials at no additional charge?
b) A company like EA, Activision or Ubisoft, that bring you derivative sequels and/or games with questionable quality, full of obnoxious online DRM, install limits, region restrictions, regional and inflated pricing, and exploitative day one/disc-locked DLC and/or blatantly overpriced "Collector's Editions"...and then use "piracy" as a way to blame their customers for lacklustre sales, while justifying all of the above?
It's entirely up to you, what you want to see more of. More games like The Witcher 1/2 and Cyberpunk, or more games like Diablo III (always-online DRM), Modern Warfare 3 (derivative PC-hostile port) and Mass Effect 3 (exploitative DLC). More companies that are focused on their
customers' needs, or more companies focused on their
shareholders' needs.
Ultimately, it's up to you.