Just came across this. Can there be a chance of it actually being any good? Every time they have announced a new installment in the Terminator franchise in the past, I have rolled my eyes, and expressed skepticism of the possibility of them actually being able to do yet another Terminator movie that's worth watching. But, I must say, I have actually enjoyed them all for the most part. Can they really pull off another one with an aging Scharzenegger? I have to believe his part in it will be fairly limited, but still....

I just read his interview aloud while impersonating him and it was hillarious

I was left disappointed by 3 and Salvation so I'm not holding out any hope for this one.

It's gonna suck .

Am I the only one that loved Salvation?

Guess so. :D

"I'll be ba--AHH, my back!"

No... it was an ok movie.

That's exactly why they CGId his face in Salvation. He didn't like it but it looked better than a 70 year old killer robot.

Anyone thinks its ridiculous to make a reboot with the original actor?

He actually says in the interview (in the link) that he wasn't IN the movie because he was governor at the time.

You actually... loved it? I'm sad now. :(

Mmm.. for me it had few cool parts mixed with many uninteresting sections.
That surgery was the last drop.. -_-'

Even T3 was average.. mostly ruined because of the main character transformed from badass to coward.. LOL!

Heh, I think they might have had to CGI his face anyway due to him just simply being older and not having the body he did in 1984.

I watched some of the tv show (Sarah Connor Chronicles), and it was pretty good overall, but the timelines for the Terminator universe are more mixed up than the legal rights to the No One Lives Forever games. :p

It can't get anymore boring then terminator 2. Good god that film needs a shorter edit.

I agree, that series was interesting, even if with its own timeline\plot. (and Summer Glau is hot :P )
Too bad that S3 was canceled.

Blasphemy!!
(p.s: director's cut alternate ending = horrible)