I'm not here to cause any serious trouble. I just want to state my opinion.

The most expensive game on GOG. It is current title release a couple months ago. I can understand DRM-Free. I feel this game will infiltrate other companies to to go ahead and use gog.com as current DRM Free distribution. This site was created based on good old games. Lot of games are more than 5+ years old and is designed to bring life to old games. Don't bring up Witcher 1 as a reason. If that is the case, then why is Fallout 3 or Vegas not on here when there is already Fallout 1, 2 on GOG.

This is probably a business decision to put it on this site.

Please GOG, do not consider breaking the whole purpose of this site. To bring Good Old Games.

Any comments/feedback welcome.

It was made by CD Projekt, the guys who run GOG.

GOG is owned by CDProjekt, and The Witcher was developed by CDProjekt Red. If it really bothers you, think of it like nepotism.

EDIT: Damn it swizzle66! ;p

Okay, it makes sense now. Thanks for the clarification. It just caught me by surprise.

No one can answer easy questions faster than me! :D

Has it really been that long? It seems like only yesterday that I even joined GOG, much less waited to pre-order, pre-ordered, and played The Witcher 2, and I've already gone over the 300 day mark. I guess I'm not that new of a member anymore. >_>

I think that would be awesome, it took alot of balls to release a AAA title without any DRM. I hope you are right. Currently i fell ashamed for giving Ubi-suck $55 dollars to beta MMH6.

I paid $86 and didn't even get beta access. If the game sports some kind of a draconian DRM, I'm going to be annoyed greatly.