JCD-Bionicman: It's really simple. If a woman successfully meets all the requirements of a direct combat role, you don't deny her. For the ones that don't, nobody is telling you to kiss their asses, you can deny them. Yes, some women aren't capable of fulfilling direct combat roles, that doesn't mean you ban all of them. Some men aren't capable of such fulfillment either.
I'm aware that the "ban on women in combat" has recently been lifted, but there is still lingering ignorant resistance.
Thoughts?
Because female life is more valuable than male life is why. Look at the resources available in the US that are men's only versus women's only. You'd be hard pressed to find any resources being devoted to anything positive involving men.
Plus, we're going to really see how committed women in general are to equality when the changes come up for debate on selective service requiring them to sign up.