It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
CaptainGyro: I'm pretty sure that buying a $700 pc will get you much much more than 3 hours of "trying to be uber with all teh flash" but ok.
avatar
carnival73: People were complaining, shortly after the PS3 was released, that a lot of the games could be completed in under three hours.

I'm thinking "Well, yeah....higher res textures, more detailed models and levels....if you're attempting "Hardcore" not even a Blu-Ray will take you too far."
I'm completely lost on how the conversation has turned in this direction.

All I know is that I'm maintaining my stance that the requirements for The Witcher 2 aren't insanely high and leaving it at that
Post edited May 09, 2011 by CaptainGyro
avatar
carnival73: People were complaining, shortly after the PS3 was released, that a lot of the games could be completed in under three hours.

I'm thinking "Well, yeah....higher res textures, more detailed models and levels....if you're attempting "Hardcore" not even a Blu-Ray will take you too far."
avatar
CaptainGyro: I'm completely lost on how the conversation has turned in this direction.

All I know is that I'm maintaining my stance that the requirements for The Witcher 2 aren't insanely high.
I personally am not too bothered by it.

I always remain two years behind in gaming anyway.

By the time I can afford the upgrade, Witcher 2 GotY Edition with all DLCs and necessary patches will be found bargain binned.

....and I'll probably still be trying to finish the first one anyway. XD
Would a GTS 450 1gb do the trick?

3.02ghz dual core
4gb ram
850watt PSU

Pretty certain my 4650 512mb will have a heart attack if i try.

(Money is an issue and why im not looking at more than £100)

Edit:
Looks like the CPU would be the problem
Attachments:
screenie.jpg (207 Kb)
Post edited May 09, 2011 by reaver894
I have a 4 years old notebook and I'm quite sure it'll run. I mean, I run most of new games on high, that's for consoles! :D
Wow, yougamers is indeed horribly inaccurate. Take a look at this gem.
Attachments:
lol.jpg (301 Kb)
Pretty similar to Crysis 2 and Magicka requirements.
avatar
Whiteblade999: I want to switch to an Intel CPU but I really don't have the cash sitting around to get a new mobo, CPU, and some ram. That whole being a college student thing with limited income screws up the upgrade (and buying most games new) plan.
avatar
GameRager: Find a mobo that takes your current RAM and CPU then, but which can accomidate more/bigger/faster(yet same DDR level) ram.
Its a waste to buy another AMD motherboard for a couple games when I'm planning on getting an Intel one in about 6 months don't you think?
avatar
Tserge: Wow, yougamers is indeed horribly inaccurate. Take a look at this gem.
That's what you get for going ATI sucka!
avatar
Tserge: Wow, yougamers is indeed horribly inaccurate. Take a look at this gem.
Hahahah :P That's kinda lol.

--

Well, I cant wait to try this game with my Phenom II x6 and XFX HD5750, I hope I can max it without any problem :3 *prepares to add lots of FSAA Samples*
both those site said i dont have a powerful enough video card...but i am using a ati radeon 4550 HD lol
Well, in a week I'll see if my trusty laptop, which is definitely below the minimum reqs, can run this thing. It can run most modern console ports on reasonably good settings, but I'm not at all expecting that to be the case here, just judging from how good the game looks. However, I am prepared to run it on Low at 800X600, as long as the frame rate is smooth.