Well I decided to go save Triss from the Niffgardians instead of helping Roche.
I feel that maybe I was being a bit self centered with this decision. I should have been thinking more about the fate of Temeria, instead of my own needs. Surely saving Temeria's potential ruler should have taken priority?
Which decision did you folks choose?

I'm tired of playing the savior of everyone in RPG's, so I also saved my honey.
Roche can sue me =D

I did the same the first time, on a later playthrough I helped Roche and I thought that the story was better when I did that. I won't go into to details, but you also get some awesome loot by helping Roche.

lol. I hope Roche isn't p***** with me now. Well neutrality has it's benefits I guess.
The Niffguardian steel sword I looted was good.

I did reload and did the other bransh too, for fun (with Roche). but if Witcher 3 can import, saving triss is the one I'll use

Why? it does nothing to change how Triss feels about you, but not saving her adds alot to the Dethmold story, as well as To adding a bit to Letho's story, as he saves Triss, as well as having taken care of Yennifer. Making Letho a much more interesting character. I think it also makes the political intrigue as far as what happens to Temeria much more interesting.

I guess I will import it cause it the way I chose when I didnt know how everything would play out. I didnt know if Triss would be killed or not. would I import another one if I wanted the perfect play through, yes probably.

Sorceresses, kings, elves, everybody can go plough themselves - or eachother - I'm getting too old for this shit. I'm getting my girl and getting out of this mess ASAP.

XDDDDDDDDDD

lol
Geralt have had enough of people and their politics.
The only one ploughing Geralt from now, is Triss right?

LOL well theres no brothel in Loc, so I guess so. I hope for Geralt's sake that Triss doesn't find out about all the women he's ploughed whilst she was captured lol.

Well, Ves disappeared, so maybe he can go find her. She made a pretty hot bed.

Wouldn't it also be self-centered to not save your kidnapped friend/romantic interest? Either way, you're screwing someone over (sure she's saved either way, but it's still selfish to be right there and decide to go do something else).

Besides, saving Triss means that she speaks up near the end and makes sorceresses look slightly less bad, which hopefully means that they won't hunt down Sile, Phillipa, and all those other interesting characters between W2 and W3. They deserve better than to pull a Shani and disappear between the games.

roleplay a witcher, geralt is one horny dude and It's all about the sexxy,. anyone who does not save Triss is a witcher homo, lol

yeah true. I guess I couldn't do something else when I knew that Triss was captured. I saved her at the first opportunity.

I did the same as well. Roche can go plough his nation, so long as I get to plough my... Girl. But, seriously, I though Triss would help out a lot more. Leaving her to die would have been an egregious error no matter where you stand.