Posted June 12, 2015
Hey everyone
I have a question around undiscovered locations and what appears to be a link between notice boards.
Upon arrival in White Orchard in the very beginning, the map did not show any undiscovered locations. After looking at the notice board (without even taking down the notes) the map is populated with many (if not close to all) undiscovered locations.
To me this is very unrealistic as one cannot know about these locations without reading notes about them or learning from them from other sources e.g. during discussions or finding letters etc.
One instance in particular the location of half-buried treasure was revealed as an unknown location, yet the notice board made no mention of it. I managed to find a letter after the fact on a dead soldier on the battlefield which mentions this location, however I cannot fathom how this could work in real life situation? It would have made sense if the location was only revealed upon discovery of the letter and not the notice board which as I said made no mention of it.
I know one can change to option to remove these marked locations completely, allowing you to find them yourself through exploring, however I cannot help but feel that the default behavior is illogical and spoils the game a lot as it does not make sense at all.
I am of the opinion that the locations (or rather general proximity) should only show up if one finds hints or evidence thereof through mechanisms such as actual notes on the notice boards, letters, discussions and overhearing other conversations etc.
What do you guys think?
I have a question around undiscovered locations and what appears to be a link between notice boards.
Upon arrival in White Orchard in the very beginning, the map did not show any undiscovered locations. After looking at the notice board (without even taking down the notes) the map is populated with many (if not close to all) undiscovered locations.
To me this is very unrealistic as one cannot know about these locations without reading notes about them or learning from them from other sources e.g. during discussions or finding letters etc.
One instance in particular the location of half-buried treasure was revealed as an unknown location, yet the notice board made no mention of it. I managed to find a letter after the fact on a dead soldier on the battlefield which mentions this location, however I cannot fathom how this could work in real life situation? It would have made sense if the location was only revealed upon discovery of the letter and not the notice board which as I said made no mention of it.
I know one can change to option to remove these marked locations completely, allowing you to find them yourself through exploring, however I cannot help but feel that the default behavior is illogical and spoils the game a lot as it does not make sense at all.
I am of the opinion that the locations (or rather general proximity) should only show up if one finds hints or evidence thereof through mechanisms such as actual notes on the notice boards, letters, discussions and overhearing other conversations etc.
What do you guys think?