MIK0: Still it was the company involved in the crowdfunding, ArtPlay and 505 Games included, which had the responsability to know before if the game would have drm or not and properly communicate it before the campaign ended. The mini game was part of the stretch goals, they got money for it. If they had no control over it it's still their fault.
The list of companies to be aware of is:
Inti Creates
ArtPlay
505 Games
Fangamer
Dico
KiNgBrAdLeY7: Fangamer was a victim of Inti-Creates' stunt. They lost time and work/man-power, to tend to the issue... Inti-Creates announced last minute, that a GOG entry would never come, so Fangamer, which offered that option/order/pledge, was d!cked over.
ArtPlay maybe, but only little. As i understand, it is the publisher (?) of the main game and the one responsible for marketing. Still, Inti-Creates, besides developers of the mini-game, kind of "solo-published" it, as well... Hence the issues, (dis)agreememnts, Iga not having total control, etc.
505 was always pro DRM-Free version and ever since the beginning, announced main game being delivered here, as well.
IGA partnered with 505 for main game, Inti-Creates for the minigame. He was fully in charge at 505, decorative "inspector" in Inti-Creates.
Yet you are right. It is a real shame we here, aren't getting a complete package, as we were led to believe. But to each their own. Inti-Creates is the stinker.
The point is that they parnered together and had to make things works, which didn't happen. They are all so-called professional. When issues arised, backers had to pay for that. The ones in charge of the campaign should have make things clear from the beginning and properly communicate during the whole campaign, which didn't happen: apart from the pr updates with almost no news, they are not even present in the comment section and for every issue they simply have no solution. 505 games is a publisher, they should know better. Then they rushed backers to reply to a survey only to later find out that the the drm-free version of the mini game was not available. Who was in charge of verified this information before? Then they stick to the fact that "it was never promised" while in true it was never said it wouldn't be drm-free as the whole campaign marketed on that fact for the main game (with no further information one should think it would follow the same rules). Then they reassured the backers that the ps vita was still happening but we know how it ended. They could have said that before closing the survey, nothing happened the could have make them change their mind. Only recently with che ps vita version being cancelled they issued refunds, but they were going to do partial refund it the news wasn't spread everywhere. They so much more interested in the money the got and that they don't put to good use than to be true to their promises. So they are all stinkers.