It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
360 Terabytes on ONE cd?

Researchers at the University of Southampton have managed to use lasers to record and retrieve data from pieces of glass.

They claim it could allow up to 360 terabytes, equivalent to 580,000 CDs, to be stored on a single piece of glass the size of a standard CD.

The process uses a laser to reorder the atoms in the crystal structure of the glass.

The size and orientation of the tiny structures the laser creates adds extra information in addition to their location.

These structures change the way light passes through the glass, meaning it can then be read back



This means huge amounts of data can be stored.

The scientists say that because the glass is stable and heat resistant up to 1,000°C (1,800F), it could also be used to ensure information can be kept safe for long periods of time in archives.

Professor Jingyu Zhang, who led from the University of Southampton, said: “We are developing a very stable and safe form of portable memory using glass, which could be highly useful for organisations with big archives.

“At the moment companies have to back up their archives every five to ten years because hard-drive memory has a relatively short lifespan.

“Museums who want to preserve information or places like the national archives where they have huge numbers of documents, would really benefit.”

Dr Zhang and colleagues at Eindhoven University of Technology used device to record a 300kb digital copy of a text file into the glass and then reading it back.

It is the first time researchers had been able store a document in glass using the device and then read it back.

Previously the scientists created glass storage that could store the equivalent of a Blu-ray Disc – up to 50GB of data – but they now can store more than seven times that.

The scientists presented their latest work at the Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics in San Jose.

The recording process, which is done by focusing a laser to imprint tiny dots called "voxels" into the pure silica glass.

The process makes the glass slightly opaque and polarises the light as it passes through. This can then be read using a optical detector.

The glass memory has been compared to the "memory crystals" used in the Superman films, which contain recorded holographic video and data saved by his parents.

Professor Peter Kazansky, supervisor of the Optoelectronics Research Centre at Southampton University, added: “It is thrilling to think that we have created the first document which will likely survive the human race.

“This technology can secure the last evidence of civilisation: all we’ve learnt will not be forgotten.”
Note the confuzzling around "360TB" and a little later "previous best was 50GB, now 7 times that".... O_o!
I get the feeling from the examples stated, the write speed for this is prohibitively slow.

EDIT: The mismatch of storage could either be error by the journalist in the title, or error by the journalist in the calculation. They tend to do both.
Post edited July 10, 2013 by wpegg
I get the feeling before this technology will be available for general use there's already gonna be other more efficient solutions.
One good thing about re-archiving data onto new media every few years is that you're very likely to still have readers capable to use the old format. Imagine archiving something, coming back to read it 30 years later and there's no way to read the disc/cartridge any more, wouldn't you wish you had copied it over while the old reader still worked (instead of thinking, nah, the disc'll hold forever, it'll be fine)?
Read the topic title and thought this had something to do with a nerdy prison or something.

I don't know, quit giving me that look.
avatar
Lone3wolf: Note the confuzzling around "360TB" and a little later "previous best was 50GB, now 7 times that".... O_o!
I took it to mean that right now they can do 7 times 50GB but it has the potential to deliver 360TB.

But now that I've re-read it I'm wondering if they just misprinted GB into TB.
avatar
F4LL0UT: I get the feeling before this technology will be available for general use there's already gonna be other more efficient solutions.
I don't know. Usually the way it works is that there is always something better coming, it's just *when* it becomes affordable to the everyday consumer. Personally, I'm still waiting for Blu-ray burning to make more sense money-wise over DVDs. I think the more accurate perspective might be that by the time this technology becomes available to consumers, maybe, maybe, Blu-ray burning will be at the level DVD burning is now. Maybe "3D printing" will be affordable on the consumer level too....
okay i'm skipping blu-ray.
avatar
Shaolin_sKunk: I took it to mean that right now they can do 7 times 50GB but it has the potential to deliver 360TB.

But now that I've re-read it I'm wondering if they just misprinted GB into TB.
The mixup of GB and TB, that must have happened very early on then, because the 580,000 CDs mentioned in the same sentence as being the equivalent amount of storage space wouldn't make sense otherwise.

All the more weird that we get the Blu-ray comparison so late in the text. If the author made an initial mistake and created a comparison for the false terabyte capacity why didn't he then apply it to the Blu-ray comparison too? And if it is actually terabyte, then why didn't the second comparison give him pause?

That's quite sloppy either way...

It is thrilling to think that we have created the first document which will likely survive the human race.
Is there a word for this twisted optimism?
Does this mean we can now use a piece of glass to imprison dangerous criminals? I only ask because as good as that sounds, it only works until some group off asshole terrorist put a nuke on one of the Eiffel Tower elevators forcing Superman to toss the elevator into outer space leaving said nuclear explosion free to shatter said 'glass prison' and thus unleashing the said dangerous criminals onto the Earth. We really must try to avoid this at all cost so I can only hope this new 'glass tech' is more pipe dream than reality.
avatar
yyahoo: Maybe "3D printing" will be affordable on the consumer level too....
I hope not. Think of all the insane items people are gonna print.
avatar
yyahoo: Maybe "3D printing" will be affordable on the consumer level too....
avatar
F4LL0UT: I hope not. Think of all the insane items people are gonna print.
Yeah, the adult toy industry will probably collapse.
The article is indeed a good reading, but I recalled I heard this on some local TV a couple of years back, so I did some digging. The Telegraph article is an updated adaptation (an adjusted copy-paste) of an older, but basically the same, Telegraph article from 2011.

The original Telegraph article (2011) here.
avatar
WBGhiro: Yeah, the adult toy industry will probably collapse.
Funny, I had the same thought but decided not to share it.
avatar
WBGhiro: Yeah, the adult toy industry will probably collapse.
avatar
F4LL0UT: Funny, I had the same thought but decided not to share it.
Sharing is caring!