It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
really new vegas better than 3? I enjoyed 3 a lot more than new vegas :/ even the plot was better, well the ending sucks hard (FO3) but overall I think it's a much better game than new vegas
avatar
GastonArg: really new vegas better than 3? I enjoyed 3 a lot more than new vegas :/ even the plot was better, well the ending sucks hard (FO3) but overall I think it's a much better game than new vegas
*Throws rotten food at you.*
avatar
GastonArg: really new vegas better than 3? I enjoyed 3 a lot more than new vegas :/ even the plot was better, well the ending sucks hard (FO3) but overall I think it's a much better game than new vegas
avatar
pimpmonkey2382: *Throws rotten food at you.*
*puts out a shield that cleverly had prepared for the occasion*
1: Fallout 1
2: Fallout 2
3: Fallout NV
4: Fallout Tactics
5: Fallout 3

Doesn't deserve a number: Fallout BOS

Up until the very last one I liked them all, that's mainly just order of preference.
avatar
OneFiercePuppy: Sounds like you'd really appreciate at least two of the four DLCs for New Vegas, if you haven't already played them. Honest Hearts and Old World Blues are very dense and directed without ever feeling like you're on rails. Lonesome Road wraps things up nicely and is a good closer for the story, too. You should be able to get the DLCs for about a buck apiece on sale. I'd really recommend, based on what you're saying you liked and missed in FO:NV, that you keep an eye out or them, if you haven't already played them and think you could tolerate another play through of New Vegas.
I've played them. Lonesome Road was interesting but still lacked any major mystique beyond the central character, Honest Hearts I really didn't find all that great, though Old World Blues I definitely wish I spent more time on. I plan on doing so when I get back to the game, but neither were that memorable on the first go around. OWB particularly had so much dialogue, funny though it was, that getting to the point was a major issue. There's a lot to discover, which I appreciate, but it's perhaps a reverse problem of the rest of the game. Too much to do in not a big enough space, and having to do the same thing multiple times just to get all the endings.
Post edited April 15, 2014 by GoodGuyA
avatar
Cormoran: 1: Fallout 1
2: Fallout 2
3: Fallout NV
4: Fallout Tactics
5: Fallout 3

Doesn't deserve a number: Fallout BOS

Up until the very last one I liked them all, that's mainly just order of preference.
+1 Same order for me too
The fully patched, non-modded New Vegas was so buggy and unstable that it ranks among the ten worst games that I have ever played. The rest of the series do not.
Fallout 3
Fallout 1
Fallout New Vegas
Fallout 2

Everybody's different when it comes to taste.
really liked New Vegas for some reason and used my favorite melee weapon the Rebar club throughout the whole game
for me it's

Fallout 3
Fallout 2
Fallout tactics
Fallout 1

& if it's ever made available to me then I'll try ...
Fallout New Vegas

I don't do Steam

really nasty horrible experience I will not do again
I haven't played Fallout 2 and Tactics yet, but here's mine:

1) Fallout 1
2) Fallout: New Vegas (enjoyed the DLC, at least the ones that didn't crash on me that often)
3) Fallout 3 (enjoyed The Pitt and Point Lookout, didn't care for the other stuff DLC wise)
Post edited April 15, 2014 by RayRay13000
avatar
GastonArg: really new vegas better than 3? I enjoyed 3 a lot more than new vegas :/ even the plot was better, well the ending sucks hard (FO3) but overall I think it's a much better game than new vegas
The plot is pretty decent up until you leave Vault 112 - after that I went to explore the wasteland for as long as I could, did every possible quest, found every stupid PipBoy doll and played through all DLCs (apart from Mothershim Zeta, which I don't own and don't intend to buy because the idea behind it is so stupid :)).
And then I returned to the cringeworthy story about filtering-water-through-sand-several-times-would-do-the-same machine :) The only highlight after Vault 112 was Eden :)
Fallout 1 is good with the TeamX patch, NPC patch, and resolution patch.
Fallout 2 is good with the Restoration Project patch (which includes everything you need).
New Vegas is good with Mission Mojave, JESawyer mod, and UI mod.

I can't in good conscious recommend Fallout 3 to anyone unless you're particularly masochistic for kindergarten-tier writing and completely illogical plot.
avatar
GastonArg: really new vegas better than 3? I enjoyed 3 a lot more than new vegas :/ even the plot was better, well the ending sucks hard (FO3) but overall I think it's a much better game than new vegas
avatar
Novotnus: The plot is pretty decent up until you leave Vault 112 - after that I went to explore the wasteland for as long as I could, did every possible quest, found every stupid PipBoy doll and played through all DLCs (apart from Mothershim Zeta, which I don't own and don't intend to buy because the idea behind it is so stupid :)).
And then I returned to the cringeworthy story about filtering-water-through-sand-several-times-would-do-the-same machine :) The only highlight after Vault 112 was Eden :)
well that's what I mean, the water thing plot it's very good, it was very poorly implemented and executed specially the ending which was atrocious but again the main plot but decent enough, the fallout new vegas on the other hand was pretty lame from the get go..not bad but just average
New Vegas was not my cup of tea. It was simply too bland with not much to explore.