Yeah, lukipela...

See I'm all for freedom of speech and so on, but as a man (and that post is solely about men) I feel discriminated... Also descriptions that make men rape supporters according to her make no sense whatsoever.

So I watch porn, it's just normal porn with pornstars in it who earn cash doing it and are not forced to do this by evil rape supporters. How the f does that support rape? Going to strip club? Being pro abortion? (I bet that saying to her that her arguments are shit, she will say "I can say whatever I want", same here - I am pro abortion, stop discriminating me!)

"Watching porn in which women are depicted" - ... ok, so what kind porn can I actually watch?

"He argues that people (or just “men”) have sexual “needs.”" Yeah, next time my gf will want to have sex with her I totally will tell her she should just leave me alone as I admitting se has got sexual needs makes me a rape supporter and I cant have that!

6, why wouldn't the world's oldest profession be a legitimate job choice?

Number one - had sex with my gf while being high - I don't know whether that was a rape, she wanted to do it but then you could argue it was since her judgement was hindered by state of being high.

Oh wait, she just read what I wrote and says it was not rape. Touche.

I can think of quite a few.

Hehehe ...

No it's not. Her judgment is imposed on her by the evil patriarchal society. You are even worse than a rapist - you either:

1. Raped her and then convinced her that this was not a rape,

or

2. Ruthlessly exploited your girlfriend's naive misconception of what rape was, and took advantage of her intoxication.

You need somebody objective, like the creator of the webpage in question, to tell you that it was rape.

You evil person you! I'm now off to watch some non-rape-promoting porn (Discovery Channel, anyone?).

Preferences, one likes porn with women in it, other cartoons and animals. Whatever floats your boat I guess.

Looked at the rest of her blog and I see but won't write anything about what I think, free thought that does not agree with her is a massive rape ad in the end...

As MsbS wrote above, it's all about "objective" point of view.

Oh wait, "objective" contains "object", that immediately says you objectify lesbians or lesbian sexual activity! You evil bastard!

I think my wifes reaction was the normal response to this list
"According to her the only way to not be a rape supporter while being male is to be dead.. but then she'd argue you were one in life"

You better hope PeTA doesn’t see this or else they will literally murder you.

Just had one more look at the list (not that it is worth it). Number one in particular. Something about aconomic coercion there. My income is higher than my wife's - not only does this make me a rapist, but also there's an undertone of domestic violence there...

Enough of that bullpoo - the bloody blogger wasted too much of my time already.

I lost at #4. There was once this chick who was picking fights just for her own amusement, but then someone managed to (verbally) attack her so that it hurt her feelings. Afterwards I told her that she's the one who started it and was actually being a worse prick than her verbal assailant, so the situation was her own fault. That apparently makes me a rape-supporter.

I thought that point had a strictly sexual connotation.

Also, come on guys, is there no man who can best me :B ?

Perhaps the kind where all you see is the man-ass (hairy) from behind, with some (non-hairy) legs sticking out from under.

I'd say women are more suggested at than depicted in those scenes.

But I hate those D:

There was this - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_v._Bell

And then this, since we're all supposed to be equal under the law, you know - Skinner v. Oklahoma