I skipped to different places in the videos and didn't see any evidence at all. What I did see was a series of speculations of who would benefit from chem trails. It seems that
1. You are responsible if you benefit from chem trails
2. Chem trails exist if someone benefits from it

Not exactly rock solid, I think you'll agree.

I just don't trust steam.

Talk about invasive DRM >.<

Though, to be fair, if I ever wanted to chemically attack a city or a region, contrails would be the way to go. While everybody would be getting sick and throwing up all around town, the one plausible explanation would be laughed at.

To what end, though? If you wanted to get rid of the people, then just nuke the shit out of them.

At that altitude ?

We're going into "horrible if true" territory, but just to theorise, the main goal isn't always to kill or hurt people, but just to spread terror and confusion (for whatever reason). And if you need a covert operation with no clear suspects and method, this would be the way to go. Obviously, someone would get wise about it eventually, but the first reaction would be "seriously? that shit again?".

It was meant to be a joke, mostly. Hide in plain sight and all that. But I bet there are methods and ways to get NBC grade weapons from and airplane to ground by way of precipitation.

There are a few things that prevent me from completely dismissing the claims made in the documentaries as tinfoit hat ramblings. 1. Scientists actually admit they're either in the planning stages to spray or are already conducting trials for the purposes of preventing global warming. 2. There are serious scientists who have conducted soil and water testing and found increased amounts aluminium and barium in heavily trailed areas.

At that altitude it would just spread out over a very wide area, and it would be far too dependent on the wind not blowing too much.
You would also have to find something that is very potent.


Though really, this myth fails right at the start line, for the very same reason as why the water flouridation myth fails:
Why are not people in regions that gets a lot of these chemtrails (or that has flouridated water) any different/less fertile/more stupid/more ill than people who don't?

Courtesy of my friend:

Reuters: Harvard Study Finds Fluoride Lowers IQ - Published in Federal Gov't Journal

Have you been ingesting a lot of fluoride recently, Barry?

Where did they conduct this research?
There are no chemtrailed areas.

Aren't you the one who asked other memeber recently to keep his world opinions out of this forum? How is this different?

Your reference is disingenuous at best. It is entirely sourced from....
SOURCE NYS Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc

In case you're curious, fluoridation in water is on the order of 1 milligram per liter, which doesn't translate directly to an intake of milligrams per kilogram, but it's order of magnitude appropriate. Toxicity comes at approximately 30-50 milligrams per kilogram for elemental fluorine. Toxicity does not mean death, here. It means poisoning and adverse effects. Further, elemental fluorine is at most half the mass of fluoridating elements, meaning you're two orders of magnitude separated from "heavy fluoridation" to "this crap is wrecking your world."

If you keep up like this, you're just going to reveal to all of us that you're just another ignorant troll. Be careful.

EDIT: clarity of possession

*Cough cough*