It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
CaptainKremin: So, care to put it on the line.. what posts are you surprised about?.. I myself would rather be downcried for a strong opinion, rather than lauded for confuscation. :o
avatar
wpegg: While you're on that line, what does confuscation mean?
[url=http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=confuscation&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a]http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=confuscation&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a[/url]
avatar
wpegg: While you're on that line, what does confuscation mean?
avatar
CaptainKremin: [url=http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=confuscation&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a]http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=confuscation&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a[/url]
I see. It's a made up word. Then again I suppose all words were made up at some point. I offer my most enthusiastic contrafribularities for using such term, I'm anispeptic, frasmotic, even compunctuous to have caused you such pericombobulation.
avatar
CaptainKremin: [url=http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=confuscation&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a]http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=confuscation&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a[/url]
avatar
wpegg: I see. It's a made up word. Then again I suppose all words were made up at some point. I offer my most enthusiastic contrafribularities for using such term, I'm anispeptic, frasmotic, even compunctuous to have caused you such pericombobulation.
I beg your pardon?

In what part of that search do you see 'made up word'?... I'm sorry for your lack of vocabulary, though.
avatar
CaptainKremin: I beg your pardon?

In what part of that search do you see 'made up word'?... I'm sorry for your lack of vocabulary, though.
The lack of any dictionary definition?
low rated
avatar
CaptainKremin: I beg your pardon?

In what part of that search do you see 'made up word'?... I'm sorry for your lack of vocabulary, though.
avatar
wpegg: The lack of any dictionary definition?
Dude.. get a life.. and a better dictionary.. or a sub to online OED.
http://oxforddictionaries.com/spellcheck/?region=uk&q=confuscation
avatar
CaptainKremin: Dude.. get a life.. and a better dictionary.. or a sub to online OED.
There's no need to start throwing personal insults. You were speculating before as to how you get a higher rep. That is how you don't.
Post edited February 18, 2012 by wpegg
avatar
wpegg: I offer my most enthusiastic contrafribularities for using such term, I'm anispeptic, frasmotic, even compunctuous to have caused you such pericombobulation.
You've really worked out your banter, haven't you? ;)
avatar
wpegg: I offer my most enthusiastic contrafribularities for using such term, I'm anispeptic, frasmotic, even compunctuous to have caused you such pericombobulation.
avatar
elbaz: You've really worked out your banter, haven't you? ;)
I don't think I ever got round to congratulating you on your avatar. It's a very good choice :).
avatar
CaptainKremin: I, myself, am rather surprised GOG have opted for a DosBox shell for this, especially when a windows installer does exist... DosBox might be easier for GOG to use, but it doesn't always produced the better product for us, their customers...
...
Where a windows installer exists, that should be used first, over a DosBox shell.

Are there any technical reasons why DosBox was used instead of properly fixing the installer apart from ease of use for GOG? Are there many other games with a windows installer that GOG have opted to use DosBox instead for?
Selecting a DOS version (to be used with DOSBox) over a Windows version is more future-proof, and usually guarantees compatibility with a much wider assortment of Windows versions, graphics drivers, CPU models and speeds, memory configurations etc., because DOSBox hides such details from the game. Take for example all the older Windows games having problems with multiple CPU cores (e.g. Broken Sword 4 on quad cores?), requiring running as admin, requiring running them with compatibility modes etc... no such headaches whatsoever when running the DOS version through DOSBox.

The DOS versions will run much more probably also on future Windows releases (Win8, 9, 10, 11...) or are pretty easy to get to run on them, as long as DOSBox runs on them as well. No such guarantees whatsoever for any old Windows games, since they always depend on your HW drivers' backwards compatibility etc.

Also, I'm pretty sure Mac and Linux gamers prefer the DOS versions as well, runs better on their systems too.

After all, I think lots of compatibility problems had been reported from GOG Dungeon Keeper 2, which happens to be a Windows version. If there had been a DOS version, it probably would have had much less problems.
Post edited February 18, 2012 by timppu
avatar
wpegg: I don't think I ever got round to congratulating you on your avatar. It's a very good choice :).
Thanks! I like yours as well. I hope we see Grim Fandango here someday. It's near the top of my instabuy list.
avatar
jepsen1977: There are constructive ways to give feedback to GoG and then there are the no-so-constructive ways and the OP did choose the latter. But still he did have a valid point ie. he bought a product that doesn't work for him. Recently there was another thread here about Gorky17 that don't work for some and after testing it myself I can say that Gorky 17 doesn't work on my PC either. As GoG is getting bigger it is very important that the games they sell actually work even if that can be tricky with older games. I am not going to send a support ticket for my game because I accept it as a loss but that shouldn't happen too many times for good reasons.

With that said there are no reason to attack the OP or troll him or even telling him to commit suicide as another one here did. That is absolutely disgusting attitude to take to ask another human being to kill himself because he said something about GoG. Let's just say that I wouldn't mind if posters who tell others to kill themselves would get banned from GoG.
Fuck yeah. The old members here are supposed to be the relatively mature ones, but it seems like they're also the most easily aggravated when it comes to people complaining in the main forum. I can see some of that frustration; poking a little fun at it is one thing (I did that a few days ago, admittedly), but calling his name "shitty" and telling him to kill himself is pretty bad. :P
avatar
CaptainKremin:
I think that it's pretty obvious what posts he's talking about to anyone who isn't trying to nitpick. Hint: the ones that are counterflaming the OP, not the ones with useful information.
avatar
tfishell: Fuck yeah. The old members here are supposed to be the relatively mature ones, but it seems like they're also the most easily aggravated when it comes to people complaining in the main forum. I can see some of that frustration; poking a little fun at it is one thing (I did that a few days ago, admittedly), but calling his name "shitty" and telling him to kill himself is pretty bad. :P
Well, you have to take into account who it was that suggested suicide. Not exactly the most tactful member of this community.
Post edited February 18, 2012 by jefequeso
avatar
CaptainKremin: I, myself, am rather surprised GOG have opted for a DosBox shell for this, especially when a windows installer does exist... DosBox might be easier for GOG to use, but it doesn't always produced the better product for us, their customers...
...
Where a windows installer exists, that should be used first, over a DosBox shell.

Are there any technical reasons why DosBox was used instead of properly fixing the installer apart from ease of use for GOG? Are there many other games with a windows installer that GOG have opted to use DosBox instead for?
avatar
timppu: Selecting a DOS version (to be used with DOSBox) over a Windows version is more future-proof, and usually guarantees compatibility with a much wider assortment of Windows versions, graphics drivers, CPU models and speeds, memory configurations etc., because DOSBox hides such details from the game. Take for example all the older Windows games having problems with multiple CPU cores (e.g. Broken Sword 4 on quad cores?), requiring running as admin, requiring running them with compatibility modes etc... no such headaches whatsoever when running the DOS version through DOSBox.

The DOS versions will run much more probably also on future Windows releases (Win8, 9, 10, 11...) or are pretty easy to get to run on them, as long as DOSBox runs on them as well. No such guarantees whatsoever for any old Windows games, since they always depend on your HW drivers' backwards compatibility etc.

Also, I'm pretty sure Mac and Linux gamers prefer the DOS versions as well, runs better on their systems too.

After all, I think lots of compatibility problems had been reported from GOG Dungeon Keeper 2, which happens to be a Windows version. If there had been a DOS version, it probably would have had much less problems.
Fair enough mate.. thx for the explaination.. I would have thought it would have been the other way about....

The more you know ;)
avatar
CaptainKremin:
avatar
jefequeso: I think that it's pretty obvious what posts he's talking about to anyone who isn't trying to nitpick. Hint: the ones that are counterflaming the OP, not the ones with useful information.
Yeah.. and I would have come to that assumption myself.. but that's all it would have been.. an assumption. Too much missing from the post to draw a proper conclusion.
Post edited February 18, 2012 by CaptainKremin
avatar
timppu: Selecting a DOS version (to be used with DOSBox) over a Windows version is more future-proof, and usually guarantees compatibility with a much wider assortment of Windows versions, graphics drivers, CPU models and speeds, memory configurations etc., because DOSBox hides such details from the game. Take for example all the older Windows games having problems with multiple CPU cores (e.g. Broken Sword 4 on quad cores?), requiring running as admin, requiring running them with compatibility modes etc... no such headaches whatsoever when running the DOS version through DOSBox.

The DOS versions will run much more probably also on future Windows releases (Win8, 9, 10, 11...) or are pretty easy to get to run on them, as long as DOSBox runs on them as well. No such guarantees whatsoever for any old Windows games, since they always depend on your HW drivers' backwards compatibility etc.

Also, I'm pretty sure Mac and Linux gamers prefer the DOS versions as well, runs better on their systems too.

After all, I think lots of compatibility problems had been reported from GOG Dungeon Keeper 2, which happens to be a Windows version. If there had been a DOS version, it probably would have had much less problems.
avatar
CaptainKremin: Fair enough mate.. thx for the explaination.. I would have thought it would have been the other way about....

The more you know ;)
avatar
jefequeso: I think that it's pretty obvious what posts he's talking about to anyone who isn't trying to nitpick. Hint: the ones that are counterflaming the OP, not the ones with useful information.
avatar
CaptainKremin: Yeah.. and I would have come to that assumption myself.. but that's all it would have been.. an assumption. Too much missing from the post to draw a proper conclusion.
dude...it's not like he was laying out a complex point of view or anything. He was commenting on the immature reactions that some people had. It's perfectly legit for him to assume that everyone is going to understand what he's talking about, just like someone could say "well...SOME PEOPLE blah blah blah negativity," and the people around would know exactly who he's referring to. That's human communication.