It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Ol' Saint Peter will probably give him a slap and say "What were you thinking?" maybe even God will be waiting to do it.

I've never understood how people can be so utterly delusional as to think that a God they push as being so full of 'love' is so riddled with phobias about the activities, beliefs and sexual orientation of his own creation. If God suffers all the same traits and hang ups that humanity does then he/she/it/Space dog, is not worth worshipping.
avatar
serpantino: I've never understood how people can be so utterly delusional as to think that a God they push as being so full of 'love' is so riddled with phobias about the activities, beliefs and sexual orientation of his own creation.
It's been a long time since I read up on the particular beliefs of the Westboro Baptists, but I'm fairly certain Phelps explicitly said that his God was a God of hate. So I guess if you feel like awarding points for at least not pretending that hate is love, then Phelps gets a few of those. (Though I disagree with the opinion expressed elsewhere in this thread that Phelps somehow had a more "honest", less selective approach to scripture than other Christians. Apart from the general point that nobody can read the Bible without a certain degree of partiality, anyone who reads it and comes away with a myopic fixation on homosexuality is far from being "unselective".)
As horrible a person as Fred Phelps was, I have to thank him.

Thank him because his "church's" extreme views have done more to help gay rights in this country than anything else. Many people who were ambivalent about gay marriage, or even against, began to support it because of the extreme hatred this group showed.

Thank him because his demonstrations brought out the best in humanity. Look at pictures of his protests. Look at the number of people who showed up to support the grieving families and protect them from the protesters. People from all walks of life turned up to demonstrate that there is still some good left in humanity.

So, thank you Fred Phelps. Thank you.
I think there's still a difference between being "happy" or feeling relieved that somebody died and celebrating it. I didn't know the guy, but what I heard about him in this thread sounds really bad. Ah well.
avatar
tinyE:
avatar
TStael: now it is too late to dance upon his grave as it is meaningless.
Exactly when did I say I'd be doing this?
I don't mind be criticized, god knows I deserve it especially for this thread, but help me out here by not inventing shit.
Is the world a bit better when such individuals do not exist ?

I'd say probably, yes. He did strongly embody some major elements that make this world an uselessly, arbitrarily difficult place for a lot of decent, innocent people. And he was pulling the world in a direction making it worse.

This can often be questionned, in ideologies (for instance it's an accusation often thrown at each others, in good faith, by those who believe in the ultracapitalistic or the socialist models), but i'd say that here we have quite a clear cut objective case of what's the most wrong on earth. Bigoted homophobic, racist or sexist intolerance drags society backwards by encouraging undue hostilities and oppositions, and it's good whenever one of its more vocal and nasty proponents shuts up.

There, technically.
Boy, was this ever posted in the wrong thread.

Ever wanted to delete own forum post? Vote for it here -http://www.gog.com/wishlist/site/delete_own_forum_post
Post edited March 21, 2014 by amok
avatar
DireRabbit: As horrible a person as Fred Phelps was, I have to thank him.

Thank him because his "church's" extreme views have done more to help gay rights in this country than anything else. Many people who were ambivalent about gay marriage, or even against, began to support it because of the extreme hatred this group showed.

Thank him because his demonstrations brought out the best in humanity. Look at pictures of his protests. Look at the number of people who showed up to support the grieving families and protect them from the protesters. People from all walks of life turned up to demonstrate that there is still some good left in humanity.

So, thank you Fred Phelps. Thank you.
By the way this may be the best post in this thread.
avatar
Telika: Is the world a bit better when such individuals do not exist ?

I'd say probably, yes. He did strongly embody some major elements that make this world an uselessly, arbitrarily difficult place for a lot of decent, innocent people. And he was pulling the world in a direction making it worse.

This can often be questionned, in ideologies (for instance it's an accusation often thrown at each others, in good faith, by those who believe in the ultracapitalistic or the socialist models), but i'd say that here we have quite a clear cut objective case of what's the most wrong on earth. Bigoted homophobic, racist or sexist intolerance drags society backwards by encouraging undue hostilities and oppositions, and it's good whenever one of its more vocal and nasty proponents shuts up.

There, technically.
I missed the beginning of this thread yesterday, but I have now finished reading thru from page one.
First - Thank you Telika for your well thought-out summary. It's well said and I agree.
I find some of the attitudes expressed difficult to accept and comprehend, eg; the Bible is full of hate even tho he doesn't read it, since he didn't hurt me and his hate isn't in my backyard, or he should be praised for expressing his beliefs or the supposedly "holy" attitude..all paraphrased please. I believe such attitudes create evil people. When people like Fred Phelps first start spreading their twisted thoughts, it is too often "swept under the rug" and ignored. And that is just when good people should be stepping up to the plate and trying to stop him. I am glad he is gone. Amen.
avatar
DireRabbit: snip
That is a good point, and it is true that people often need to see a belief carried to its inevitable extreme in order to see how truly vile it is. Not to make a facile comparison, but it wasn't until the horrors of the Holocaust that a lot of the institutionalised prejudices in Europe at last began to abate. So too this home-grown virulent homophobia forced many people to examine their own stance, and re-evaluate it.

Certainly there is a degree of making-lemonade-from-lemons, as this man did cause (or attempt to cause) genuine anguish in people, and was monstrous to his own kin. But much of human history is about wresting progress from tragedy, and you are correct that there was a lot of good resulting from the reactions to this man's evil.
avatar
IAmSinistar: snip

I think the celebratory wake is a much better reply to death than a grim funeral. Death is inevitable, why shouldn't we mark it with a revel over all the joy and delight that the person brought to us? I know that when my time comes I'd much rather people be taking merry fellowship than brooding like a parliament of rooks. And those I know who died would, I feel, have wanted the same. I don't want to be a person who desires others to be miserable at his death, that just seems too self-important somehow.
The reason we cry and grieve is not because the diseased wants us to, and I don't think that we do it over their demise or with their fate in mind. IMHO, It's a way of expressing our pain and inability (often even unwillingness) to deal with the fact that a certain beloved person will no longer be part of our daily lives in a physical way, we grieve because we won't be able to interact and share moments of our lives with that person ever again, we shed tears because their demise leaves a big empty spot in our lives that we can't fill. Sometimes, there's even some guilt in the mix and the knowledge that one won't ever have a chance to do right by that person can be pretty heavy.
Essentially, we grieve over ourselves, over the state their demise leaves us, not them; yes, it is rather selfish, but it's a reaction born on a subconscious level and one probably doesn't even realise it unless they give it some serious thought, still it's part of human nature and I don't condemn it.
avatar
amok: Boy, was this ever posted in the wrong thread.

Ever wanted to delete own forum post? Vote for it here -http://www.gog.com/wishlist/site/delete_own_forum_post
I'm tempted to want to delete this thread. :D However it seems to have given an avenue for some people to vent on this subject so in that regard I guess it was worth it. I just hope it doesn't effect the way people treat each other in the rest of the forum.
I for one am glad that Fred Phelps did what he did, for just one reason: he's great proving grounds for Freedom of Speech in America. It's a cornerstone of our country and our way of trying to police ourselves/our government.

When he can say something that only perhaps 10,000 people agree with and the other 300+ million disagree with, then when an unpopular but true and important thing needs to be said, it allows it to be given its fair chance and sway millions.

Yay for free speech!

And it is sad that he died. I prefer that when people die, they die with more honor and dignity. But, TinyE, I can understand your joy of another person filled with boiling hate passes away.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: The reason we cry and grieve is not because the diseased wants us to, and I don't think that we do it over their demise or with their fate in mind. IMHO, It's a way of expressing our pain and inability (often even unwillingness) to deal with the fact that a certain beloved person will no longer be part of our daily lives in a physical way, we grieve because we won't be able to interact and share moments of our lives with that person ever again, we shed tears because their demise leaves a big empty spot in our lives that we can't fill. Sometimes, there's even some guilt in the mix and the knowledge that one won't ever have a chance to do right by that person can be pretty heavy.

Essentially, we grieve over ourselves, over the state their demise leaves us, not them; yes, it is rather selfish, but it's a reaction born on a subconscious level and one probably doesn't even realise it unless they give it some serious thought, still it's part of human nature and I don't condemn it.
Exactly so. And I do not begrudge anyone the period of mourning that follows a death. I go through that myself. It is natural, healthy, and as you say, has as much to do with our own feelings of loss as it does with empathy for those gone.

I can understand this grief being resurgent at a funeral as well, since seeing others triggers more memories of the deceased and makes the loss even keener.

My stance on the celebratory wake is that it should come once the primary grieving is done, much of which has already happened in private before the gathering. A wake enables people to find strength in each other and begin the process of resuming living. It also celebrates those who have passed, and helps us keep them alive in our memories, by giving us a final experience of them that is not centered on death, but on the connections and impacts they made on everyone around us in life.
avatar
IAmSinistar: Exactly so. And I do not begrudge anyone the period of mourning that follows a death. I go through that myself. It is natural, healthy, and as you say, has as much to do with our own feelings of loss as it does with empathy for those gone.

I can understand this grief being resurgent at a funeral as well, since seeing others triggers more memories of the deceased and makes the loss even keener.

My stance on the celebratory wake is that it should come once the primary grieving is done, much of which has already happened in private before the gathering. A wake enables people to find strength in each other and begin the process of resuming living. It also celebrates those who have passed, and helps us keep them alive in our memories, by giving us a final experience of them that is not centered on death, but on the connections and impacts they made on everyone around us in life.
How do you define "primary" grieving? And what's the measure for "much of which"?

Either way, even the wake is more about and for the living and the dead.