Posted February 08, 2009
I don't think they're pulling a fast one. If one reads their "Bill of Rights," it clearly takes a more conciliary tone rather than a hardline anti-DRM stance. There's nothing in there about abolishing DRM, if fact it clearly explicitly states it believes in the right of developers to protect their game somehow. It merely advocates methods more friendly to the consumer (including openess, buglessness, and support). I believe Impulse is true to the bill.
The just need to improve the catalog and ease-of-use a little more imo. And make it more clear exactly which 3rd party games use 3rd party DRM, what DRM they use, what files and registry entries those DRM schemes use, exactly how they work, and where to go to seek support for DRM issues.
The just need to improve the catalog and ease-of-use a little more imo. And make it more clear exactly which 3rd party games use 3rd party DRM, what DRM they use, what files and registry entries those DRM schemes use, exactly how they work, and where to go to seek support for DRM issues.