It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Malfsyde: They are most certainly asses and I don't like DRM any more than everybody else, but Blizzard doesn't owe you anything.
They are the ones who want us to buy they product, they definitely owns us more than we do.
Post edited August 01, 2011 by Gersen
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: In any case, the money made per transaction for Blizzard would literally be pennies. The amounts wouldn't even be pocket change for a company like that. Treating this as some 'profit making scheme' is simply horribly misguided.
avatar
Gersen: That's the main purpose of micro-transaction, maybe only pennies but pennies on X thousands of transactions, why do you think more and more publishers go crazy about micro transactions, because they need some pocket change for their office vending machine.

Also like the Blizzard dude said "the world of gaming is not the same as it was when D2 came out" so we have no way of knowing of "optional" those buy-able items will be or how much thousands of hours of mindless grinding you need to do to obtain them "for free" in game.
Of course I understand what you are saying. My standpoint was already stated in another post, I said that I don't like this system and I explained why. On the other hand, Blizzard has delivered me quality entertainment for 15 years or something. It's rare that they've let me down, so as already stated, I don't like what I am reading, but I'll give them the benefit of doubt. I don't see the point of going on a witch hunt.

What most people seem to be disregarding is the fact that there will not be one, but TWO auction houses. One for ingame currency, one for real money. Now it is absolutely vital that they get the balance between the two right, because if the 'real money' market becomes the only viable place where you can buy your gear then... well fuck... I won't be playing since I don't ever intend to actually use hard currency to buy something in this game. On the other hand, whether you like Blizzard's games or not, they have always delivered a quality product. I don't see them implementing this system without giving it A LOT of careful thought.
avatar
godspeeed: its perfectly fine for me. Everyone will be fine with it at some point...
Perfectly fine for most I'd agree. Everyone, most definitely not, no.

avatar
FraterPerdurabo: I don't see them implementing this system without giving it A LOT of careful thought.
... and I don't see me paying full-price for such a system without giving it A LOT of careful thought.
Anyone intending to accepting this from Blizzard, should keep his / her mouth shut about DRM (including Ubisoft), companies controling / datamining.
Post edited August 01, 2011 by Siannah
It sounds like Diablo 3 is shaping up to be a lot more like an MMO than an action RPG. I suppose it makes sense, WoW has gotten Blizzard more money than all of their other titles combined. Starcraft 2 didn't earn them as many billions as they wanted, so it seems they won't bother with a single-player game ever again. Pity.
avatar
Malfsyde: They are most certainly asses and I don't like DRM any more than everybody else, but Blizzard doesn't owe you anything.
avatar
Gersen: They are the ones who want us to buy they product, they definitely owns us more than we do.
People will still buy the product, Blizzard will get away with it and be stinking rich as usual. Why should they care if they hurt your feelings? If you pay them for it, this is just the shit you sign up for. The only thing that will stop them is if people don't buy it. I was already going to do that before today.
Post edited August 01, 2011 by Malfsyde
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: Blizzard has delivered me quality entertainment for 15 years or something. It's rare that they've let me down
I too have been a loyal fan of Blizzard since the beginning having purchased multiple copies of every game release. The problem, as I see it, is that the Blizzard of today is nothing like the Blizzard of old. It is obvious that there has been a major change and I believe this is what generates most of the negativity towards the "new" Blizzard.

We all want more great games like ones we love from the past. The direction and attitude Blizzard is displaying guarantees that those days are long past. I have turned in my Blizzard fanboy card. Difficult to do since they were the only publisher that I regularly hyped. . . =)
avatar
Malfsyde: People will still buy the product, Blizzard will get away with it and be stinking rich as usual. Why should they care if they hurt your feelings? If you pay them for it, this is just the shit you sign up for. Then only thing that will stop them is if people don't buy it. I was already going to do that before today.
And ? just because peoples will buy the product no matter what, it doesn't mean that those who don't like it should stay quiet and accept it.

Not buying it is fine, but not buying it without telling them why you didn't bought it is mostly useless.
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: Blizzard has delivered me quality entertainment for 15 years or something. It's rare that they've let me down
avatar
Stuff: I too have been a loyal fan of Blizzard since the beginning having purchased multiple copies of every game release. The problem, as I see it, is that the Blizzard of today is nothing like the Blizzard of old. It is obvious that there has been a major change and I believe this is what generates most of the negativity towards the "new" Blizzard.

We all want more great games like ones we love from the past. The direction and attitude Blizzard is displaying guarantees that those days are long past. I have turned in my Blizzard fanboy card. Difficult to do since they were the only publisher that I regularly hyped. . . =)
Meh, I don't really see the difference. Granted, I am not a fanboy. The past 15 years with Blizzard has been a bumpy ride. Whenever they please me, I praise them, but I also give them a lot of flak for certain design choices that I don't agree with.

Like I've already said many times, I don't like this idea. However, ultimately no-one's forcing me to use the item shop. As long as the regular ingame auction house with the ingame currency is perfectly viable and competitive, I really won't give a shit. If it's not, well the game's fucked.

Think about Diablo II for example. The reason why I can still replay that game so many times is because I've been selling shit on forums for a decade for forum gold (at d2jsp), so whenever I feel like picking the game up again, I can immediately deck myself out with a decent character. The idea of starting from the bottom again after your characters expire is nauseating. Diablo II could thus have benefited from having some kind of 'legit' item shop, which would ease the path back into a game that is as brutal and harsh as D2.

In any case, I really don't see why Blizzard is getting so much flak. Diablo II is a decade old, yet Blizzard still has battle.net running. Blizzard is still patching the game and adding new content. The forums are still being read and blue posters are responding to queries. How many other developers do that?
avatar
ShogunDarius: ....
Blizzard proved that they actually are horrible at game security with Diablo 2. They also refused to support it after release, WOW didn't used to get that much support at times and it had ongoing payments to fund it!

I'm not surprised they see this as the easiest way to avoid the issue (I'm sure they'll reuse The Warden or whatever).

They already killed LAN play, what they're saying is:
1) Only official modding
2) No local saves, even if they can never play online
3) Biggest cash grab ever

I've been saying for awhile that D3 would be bad. The videos are gorgeous (as always with Blizzard) and clearly they have people who know how to write a story (and then leads that fail to get the story into the game in any meaningful way beyond sporadic cut scenes), their hype machine is top notch (again, as always), the fanbase is at a fever pitch, but the game won't be good. The classes are mix and match from the previous games, the ways we used to play D2 at LANs are gone, you will ONLY be able to play at latest patch level, even if they screwed up your Corpse Explosion Necromancer beyond playability, ah screw it, if you can't list 10 more yourself you really don't care and will buy it anyway.

I'd like to see a Blizzard financial failure just once, they are so arrogant.
avatar
KavazovAngel: Yes it can. Judging by Starcraft 2's guest mode, the full single player experience will be free.

Nice sensationalistic 'news' there, this was known at BlizzCon 2009.
It was known there'd be no local saves back then? Are you sure you're not conflating the lack of LAN play with no offline mode/local saves?
avatar
StingingVelvet: When they started banning people’s battle.net account for cheating in Starcraft 2, an act which prevented installing the game and authenticating for OFFLINE play, I said they had gone too crazy at protecting their game. People laughed that off… well now they’ve gone a whole other step.

People say this a lot about DRM but I never have.. they just turned a purchase into a not purchase. I will not buy this game even though I want to. Will I pirate it? I don’t know. I have honestly never downloaded a game I never bought before… I will have to struggle with my morals on that one. I likely will not, which makes the whole thing even more of a bummer.

I give us even odds that they reverse this though.
Well, you can always say "If it's ever for sale in my area I'll buy it." As you say it's only for rent just now:)
avatar
StingingVelvet: When they started banning people’s battle.net account for cheating in Starcraft 2, an act which prevented installing the game and authenticating for OFFLINE play, I said they had gone too crazy at protecting their game. People laughed that off… well now they’ve gone a whole other step.
avatar
KavazovAngel: That wasn't really cheating though. There are official cheat codes released, but those banned were modifying the game which could have possibly effected online play...

.. and we all know at what level Starcraft is on the eSports scene.
They could have DQed those accounts from ladder play without taking away their legally purchased games. Even if they had good reasons (which is debatable) doesn't mean their method of fixing it was okay, I might have reason to punish my dog from peeing on the rug but beating him half to death would not be an acceptable solution.
Post edited August 01, 2011 by orcishgamer
avatar
Gersen: And ? just because peoples will buy the product no matter what, it doesn't mean that those who don't like it should stay quiet and accept it.

Not buying it is fine, but not buying it without telling them why you didn't bought it is mostly useless.
You're free to ignite the righteous fires of indignation all you want. Blizzard is free not to give a shit. They're not idiots, they know exactly what they are doing with this. They are playing the capitalism game in all fairness and they see people like you as acceptable losses.
Post edited August 01, 2011 by Malfsyde
avatar
Delixe: Don't commit a crime in China, just don't. Blizzard have effectively legalized gold farming so those sweat shops are going to be recruiting big time.
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: Elaborate
Umm, prison wardens have their inmates farming gold for them. It literally is slave labor. Of course we do that here in the US too, we nominally pay them like 7 cents an hour or something, no they probably don't have much of a choice. There's lists of companies that do this around if you'd like to avoid them.
avatar
Delixe: Not forced you say?
And what have Blizzard got to do with this you ask? Well they have now made it much easier and they are directly going to profit from it.
avatar
FraterPerdurabo: As the article mentioned, there are perhaps over 100000 gold farmers in China. A tiny minority are being exploited through illegal activity but boo-hoo, there are people in China whose exploitation is far worse than being forced to play computer games.

As the number suggests, as there is already a huge number of gold farmers in China, the 'trade' is already well-established and hey, D3 isn't even out yet. In any case, the effect of having an official 'marketplace' is going to add much more competition to the market thereby driving prices down, which means that gold farming will be far less viable as a business. I don't like the idea of having a 'marketplace' like that, but it's always been around anyway and not including it in the game isn't going to stop the trade.
I don't think rape is any less of a crime just because murder exists... You're logic has a short circuit, maybe reflect on it a bit.

And I've never seen any proof whatsoever for the "exploited gold farmers are better off than most Chinese" argument. I know it makes people feel better but with no proof it's pretty much hot air designed to assuage one's conscience.
Post edited August 01, 2011 by orcishgamer
avatar
Malfsyde: You're free to ignite the righteous fires of indignation all you want. Blizzard is free not to give a shit. They're not idiots, they know exactly what they are doing with this. They are playing the capitalism game in all fairness and they see people like you as acceptable losses.
I sent an email to Blizzard Customer Service (not WoW service) after a late Friday hotfix broke half of my skills. The hotfix was a disproportionate knee-jerk reaction to some Arena exploit. I told them that it was extremely worrying that some random dev could implement a game-changing fix with no notice and then just leave it there all weekend without anybody even looking at it (which is what happened). That sort of behavior was dangerously close to losing lots of customers, not just me.

On Monday, I got a personalized (and rather long) email back from them apologizing and saying all the normal corporate-speak, but it was obvious that they actually cared what I thought, and didn't want to lose me as a customer. (The hotfix was reverted, too.) I was just one of the hundreds of players who surely complained, but they actually LISTENED.

Companies need to listen. They HAVE to listen. If you give players everything that they want, you'll end up spoiling your games. (This is what has happened to WoW in recent years.) But if you don't listen to them at all, bad stuff happens. Hopefully the "new" Blizz won't continue down the path of the Dark Side like they have been, but it looks like they're pretty unrepentant about it.
avatar
Delixe: Don't commit a crime in China, just don't. Blizzard have effectively legalized gold farming so those sweat shops are going to be recruiting big time.
You won't be able to play with non Europeans.
avatar
FearItself: Kotick...
Nope.
Post edited August 01, 2011 by KavazovAngel
avatar
Gersen: Making money is fine, it's when they start being complete asses about it that the problems arise.
avatar
Malfsyde: They are most certainly asses and I don't like DRM any more than everybody else, but Blizzard doesn't owe you anything.
Actually due to insane laws they'll own a large part of our iconic gaming culture probably until after my death. I argue they do indeed owe me something for this grant in perpetuity (it was supposed to be for a limited time).
avatar
KavazovAngel: You won't be able to play with non Europeans.
Gold sellers have no trouble getting around region restrictions on WoW. I highly doubt Diablo III will stop them especially as you can legally farm right in the game now.