Andy_Panthro: I didn't bother downloading it until I'd finished the game, assuming (wrongly) that I could continue after the end.
Zeewolf: Yeah, I would understand DLC like this if the game had been open to play after the ending (though to be fair, I felt the end was pretty good, and it wouldn't really have made all that much sense to make the game playable after that point). But as it isn't... well, I don't really get it.
Maybe they're hoping people will play through it more than once. Which is fair enough, I suppose. I wouldn't dream of doing that myself, there's way too much to spend my (often limited) gaming time on for me to even consider playing a 50 hour game twice. But I suppose there are people who will play it multiple times, and I can definitely see why they'd want to freshen up the experience a bit with some new content.
I guess I'm just a bit annoyed, because I really liked Dragon Age and I'd love to play a new mini adventure set in the same world, but I have finished my story in the war against the blight, and I'm satisfied with it. So I won't go back and "rewrite" it.
Agreed.
I'd have preferred a NWN/NWN2 approach, with additional expansions based in the same world.
I do replay long RPGs, but I do often repeat large parts of the quests the same way, sometimes because the alternate choices seem wrong to me, or because sometimes the only choice is "which area do I visit first?".
Not sure I'd play any other character than a mage either. Tempted to play as a fire-and-brimstone templar though. I've played mages or equivalent in almost all my playthroughs of any RPGs that allow it.
I have a vast stack of games to get through though (including Thief 1-3, Deus Ex, Medieval 2:TW, Rome TW, about a dozen GOG games and planescape torment on order!). Not sure where I'm going to find the time...