Kabuto: Funny guy you are. Complaining about competition? There's D2D, Gamergate, GMG, Amazon, Impulse, GetGames, Gamestop and a ton of brick and mortar stores.
Why are so so quick to allow to defend them when they are either buying games that they cannot resell out of region, stole the games, or even if they bought copies at wholesale like a brick and mortar store, forget breaching the EULA, but they breach the damn contract agreement they sign in order to be allowed to resell the games.
There's plenty enouhg competition as it is as it pertains to buying games even steamworks ones.
That's not competition. They typically sell the products for the same price and in some cases use the same DRM. And if the DRM isn't the same product, the restrictions are.
You keep using the word competition, I do not think it means what you think it means. I think the word you're looking for is "oligopoly."
Darkenmal: Or they could just have bought a whole bunch of keys and gotten them on sale.
stonebro: Yeah, publishers are known to hold huge yard sales with cd keys well before release of their hottest new title /facepalm
The fact is, this business is illegal, because there is no way they could have gotten the keys in a legit manner and be able to sell them at such a low price with a profit.
They couldn't have bought the game legit in the US / EU / UK, because the price there is significantly higher than $28.49.
If they've somehow gotten their hands on copies that are flagged for return, destruction or otherwise not meant for distribution, then distributing those copies is illegal.
If they've bought copies in a country where the exchange rate is so favorable that they can underprice the western market, then that's illegal because they do not have import rights.
If they're just screwing you off with fake or limited number of keys then that's illegal - fraud.
Doesn't matter which way you way it, this business is illegal, likeness to piracy, and you should know better than fronting it on a site like this.
Unless you've got some sort of citation or actual evidence, you really ought to stifle it. You assume that there's no way that they could do it, but I don't see any actual evidence that they can't do so legally.
All I see in your post is slander.